Olivia Gadecki and Linda Fruhvirtova will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Libema Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Linda Fruhvirtova who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Linda Fruhvirtova is the pick to win this match.
Linda Fruhvirtova -> 1.27
Olivia Gadecki -> 3.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Olivia Gadecki vs. Linda Fruhvirtova
There is no head to head record between Olivia Gadecki and Linda Fruhvirtova since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Olivia Gadecki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-18 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-29 | 28-13 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 9-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-18 | 20-7 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-22 | 40-17 | 10-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160 (career-high), Gadecki reached the qualifications after beating Richel Hogenkamp 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Gadecki had a good straight sets win against Hogenkamp (6-3 6-4). During the match, Gadecki scored 61 points vs Hogenkamp’s 45. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gadecki bagged 7 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Olivia Gadecki was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (28/36) of her 1st serve and 81% (13/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Hogenkamp twice after converting 50% of her break points (2/4).
Gadecki has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 70% of her matches (79-34). 2-1 on grass in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Gadecki has a compiled2-1 win-loss record in the last 5 years on grass.
Gadecki’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the W25 Bendigo and the W60 Canberra.
The Australian has a composed 22-9 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Olivia has never competed in this tournament before.
Linda Fruhvirtova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-19 | 6-10 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-28 | 15-19 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 20-7 | 7-7 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-8 | 16-4 | 3-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-9 | 5-2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 190, Linda reached the qualifications after beating Jasmijn Gimbrere 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Gimbrere (6-1 6-2). During the match Fruhvirtova scored 63 points vs Gimbrere’s 39. Fruhvirtova was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Fruhvirtova made 2 aces and she was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Linda Fruhvirtova conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 58% of her first serves in, win 86% (24/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Fruhvirtova broke Gimbrere 4 times after converting 36% of her break points (4/11).
Linda has an overall 13-9 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gadecki | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 15 |
| Pts | 61-45 | 63-39 |
| Total Points | 106 | 102 |
| Winners | 28 | 24 |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% |
Both Gadecki and Fruhvirtova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gadecki and Fruhvirtova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gadecki played 4 games more than Fruhvirtova. Gadecki scored 28 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech made 24 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gadecki | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 36/52 | 28/48 |
| %1st in | 69% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 24/28 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 81% | 50% |
Gadecki managed to score 7 aces . Fruhvirtova bagged 2 aces . Gadecki won 78% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 81% of the points. On the other side, Fruhvirtova won 86% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gadecki | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 50% | 36% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Australian broke her opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Olivia pretty effective on her serve as she has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Fruhvirtova broke her opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Linda was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Gadecki | |||
| Q1 Hogenkamp |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 61-45 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/52 | 36/52 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fruhvirtova | |||
| Q1 Gimbrere |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 63-39 | 63-39 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 28/48 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 24/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLWWWWW
LWLLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Jessika PonchetPonchet (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Taylah PrestonPreston – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Simone BolelliBolelli – Ugo HumbertHumbert (3-6 7-64 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Yannick MadenMaden (6-4 6-77 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vincent MillotMillot – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (7-5 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Yannick MertensMertens (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Jamie LoebLoeb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Storm SandersSanders – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Kateryna KozlovaKozlova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitalia DiatchenkoDiatchenko – Shelby RogersRogers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Harmony TanTan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Suzan LamensLamens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Belinda BencicBencic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
