Mats Rosenkranz and Daniel Cox will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cox who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Cox is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Cox -> 1.615
Mats Rosenkranz -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mats Rosenkranz vs. Daniel Cox
There is no head to head record between Mats Rosenkranz and Daniel Cox since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Mats Rosenkranz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-33 | 12-14 | 5-6 | 23-11 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2024 | 36-23 | 7-4 | 13-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 35-34 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 22-12 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 31-36 | 2-4 | 7-14 | 14-13 | 2-4 | 6-1 |
| 2021 | 42-30 | 1-1 | 20-18 | 15-9 | 5-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 352, the German got to the qualifications after beating Arthur Reymond 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Rosenkranz had a good straight sets win against Reymond (6-4 6-2). During the match, Rosenkranz scored 57 points vs Reymond’s 35. The German was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Rosenkranz made 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mats Rosenkranz was extremely efficient on serve to win 96% (22/23) of his 1st serve and 82% (14/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Reymond 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Rosenkranz has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 51% of his matches (191-186). 1-1 on grass in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Rosenkranz has a composed6-1 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Mats has an overall 14-17 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Cox
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-20 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 16-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-6 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 550, will start his run in the Nottingham Challenger after he played his last match in the Nottingham Challenger where he beat 5-7 6-4 7-6(10) to Hoang in the qualifications on the 5th of June.
The Brit has an aggregate 13-8 win-loss record in 2022, 0-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
This will be the first match of the year on grass.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Bath and M15 Torello.
In terms of his career, The Brit has an overall 156-102 record. He has a negative 12-21 record on grass.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosenkranz | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 35 |
| Pts | 57-35 | 116-108 |
| Total Points | 92 | 224 |
| Winners | 22 | 56 |
| %Winners | 39% | 48% |
Both Rosenkranz and Cox played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Cox lost 1 set while Mats Rosenkranz hasn’t dropped a set so far. Rosenkranz has played 1 set(s) less than Cox (2 vs 3). Therefore, Rosenkranz played 17 games less than Cox. Mats scored 22 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit bagged 56 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosenkranz | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 13 |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 72/109 |
| %1st in | 58% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 22/23 | 56/72 |
| %1st pts | 96% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 14/17 | 15/37 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 41% |
Rosenkranz scored 9 aces . Cox made 13 aces . Rosenkranz won 96% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Cox won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosenkranz | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 75% | 30% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Mats broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Mats quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Cox broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Cox conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rosenkranz | |||
| Q1 Reymond |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 57-35 | 57-35 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 23/40 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 22/23 | 22/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/17 | 14/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cox | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Alastair GrayGray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CoxCox – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian CashCash – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-1) – H2H and prediction
