Maddison Inglis and Katie Boulter will face off in the qualifications of the Viking Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Katie Boulter who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Katie Boulter is the pick to win this match.
Katie Boulter -> 1.098
Maddison Inglis -> 7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maddison Inglis vs. Katie Boulter
There is no head to head record between Maddison Inglis and Katie Boulter since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Maddison Inglis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-12 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 127, Maddison reached the qualifications after defeating Ella Mcdonald 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Inglis had a good straight sets win against Mcdonald (6-2 6-1). During the match, Inglis scored 63 points vs Mcdonald’s 38. Maddison was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Inglis fired 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Maddison Inglis was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (24/31) of her 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Mcdonald 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Inglis has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of her matches (168-117). 1-0 on grass in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Inglis has an aggregate12-9 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Maddison has a composed 8-13 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Katie Boulter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-10 | 12-4 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 5-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-20 | 22-12 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 10-4 | 4-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 16-7 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-15 | 12-9 | 5-1 | 7-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-8 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the Brit got to the qualifications after beating En Shuo Liang 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, Boulter had a good straight sets win against Shuo Liang (6-2 7-5). During the match Boulter scored 84 points vs Shuo Liang’s 71. Boulter was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Boulter struck 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Katie Boulter lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Boulter put 47% of her first serves in, winning 66% (19/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. Katie broke Shuo Liang 6 times after converting 40% of her break points (6/15).
Boulter has an aggregate 12-5 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Previously, her best result was reaching the quarter in 2018 and 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Inglis | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 |
| Pts | 63-38 | 84-71 |
| Total Points | 101 | 155 |
| Winners | 24 | 19 |
| %Winners | 38% | 23% |
Both Inglis and Boulter played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Inglis and Boulter have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Inglis played 5 games less than Boulter. The Australian scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit managed to score 19 winners (23%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Inglis | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 29/62 |
| %1st in | 65% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 19/29 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 16/33 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 48% |
Inglis fired 2 aces . Boulter made 2 aces . Inglis won 77% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Boulter won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Inglis | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 50% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Inglis broke her opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Inglis very solid her serve as she has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. Boulter broke her opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Boulter conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Inglis | |||
| Q1 Mcdonald |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 63-38 | 63-38 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 31/48 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Boulter | |||
| Q1 Shuo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 84-71 | 84-71 | |
| Total points | 155 | 155 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 23% | 23% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/62 | 29/62 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/33 | 16/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLLW
WWWWWLLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sarah Beth GreyBeth Grey – Eden SilvaSilva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Jana FettFett (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Danielle LaoLao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qiang WangWang – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Caroline GarciaGarcia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Katie VolynetsVolynets (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
