Astra Sharma and Yuriko Miyazaki will face off in the qualifications of the Viking Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Astra Sharma who should win in 3 sets.
Astra Sharma -> 1.615
Yuriko Miyazaki -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Astra Sharma vs. Yuriko Miyazaki
This will be the 2nd time that Astra Sharma and Yuriko Miyazaki square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Miyazaki (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they played, Miyazaki won 4-6 7-5 ret. in the 1st round in the W100 Bonita Springs back in 2021.
Astra Sharma
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-27 | 10-14 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-28 | 4-8 | 9-17 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-20 | 16-8 | 25-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-26 | 11-18 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-21 | 11-9 | 11-7 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 143, Sharma got to the qualifications after beating Urszula Radwanska 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Radwanska (7-5 6-1). During the match, Sharma scored 70 points vs Radwanska’s 47. Astra was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sharma recorded 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Astra Sharma lost the serve 3 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Sharma put 63% of her first serves in, winning 75% (30/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 26% (6/23) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Radwanska 7 times after converting 88% of her break points (7/8).
Sharma has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 60% of her matches (144-96). 1-0 on grass in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Sharma has an aggregate6-7 match record in the last 7 years on grass.
Sharma has an aggregate 8-13 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Yuriko Miyazaki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-32 | 17-13 | 0-1 | 24-14 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-23 | 6-10 | 0-3 | 16-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 20-11 | 1-7 | 8-7 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 34-30 | 8-13 | 3-4 | 17-7 | 5-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 52-23 | 29-9 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 234, the Japanese reached the qualifications after beating Gabriela Lee 6-75 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications against Talaba, Yuriko recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 6-2). During the match Miyazaki scored 114 points vs Talaba’s 98. Yuriko was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Miyazaki scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Yuriko Miyazaki lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Miyazaki put 63% of her first serves in, winning 62% (40/65) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the 2nd serve. Miyazaki broke Talaba 7 times after converting 44% of her break points (7/16).
The Japanese’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W60 Pretoria.
The Japanese has an aggregate 15-14 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sharma | Miyazaki |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 31 |
| Pts | 70-47 | 114-98 |
| Total Points | 117 | 212 |
| Winners | 30 | 40 |
| %Winners | 43% | 35% |
Both Sharma and Miyazaki played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Yuriko Miyazaki dropped 1 set while Astra Sharma hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Sharma has played 1 set(s) less than Miyazaki (2 vs 3). Therefore, Sharma played 12 games less than Miyazaki. Sharma scored 30 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Miyazaki managed to score 40 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sharma | Miyazaki |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 40/63 | 65/104 |
| %1st in | 63% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 40/65 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 6/23 | 22/39 |
| %2nd pts | 26% | 56% |
Sharma bagged 2 aces . Miyazaki bagged 1 ace . Sharma won 75% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 26% of the points. On the other side, Miyazaki won 62% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sharma | Miyazaki |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 7 |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/16 |
| % Converted | 88% | 44% |
| Conceded | 11 | 9 |
| Saved | 8 | 5 |
| % Saved | 73% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
The Australian broke her opponent 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 73% of the break points that she conceded. The Japanese broke her opponent 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Yuriko conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sharma | |||
| Q1 Radwanska | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 70-47 | 70-47 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/63 | 40/63 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/23 | 6/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 26% | 26% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Miyazaki | |||
| Q1 Talaba | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 114-98 | 114-98 | |
| Total points | 212 | 212 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 65/104 | 65/104 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 40/65 | 40/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sarah Beth GreyBeth Grey – Eden SilvaSilva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Jana FettFett (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Danielle LaoLao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qiang WangWang – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Caroline GarciaGarcia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Katie VolynetsVolynets (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction