Max Purcell and Jason Jung will square off in the qualifications of the Surbiton Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Max Purcell who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Max Purcell is the pick to win this match.
Max Purcell -> 1.63
Jason Jung -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Max Purcell vs. Jason Jung
This will be the 2nd time that Max Purcell and Jason Jung square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Purcell (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Purcell won 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the 1st round in the Toyota Challenger back in 2017.
Max Purcell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-24 | 10-16 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-28 | 45-17 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 21-15 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-14 | 13-9 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 170, Max got to the qualifications after defeating Toby Samuel 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Samuel (6-4 7-5). During the match, Purcell scored 78 points vs Samuel’s 61. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Purcell fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Max Purcell was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (37/49) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Samuel 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Purcell has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (186-145). 1-0 on grass in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Purcell has an overall10-9 record in the last 8 years on grass.
The Australian has an overall 12-15 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256, the Chinese got to the qualifications after defeating Aleksandr Nedovyesov 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Jason had a good straight sets win against Nedovesov (6-1 6-3). During the match Jung scored 56 points vs Nedovesov’s 35. Jung was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Jung wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jason Jung was very efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jason broke Nedovesov 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Jung has an overall 8-13 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Purcell | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 16 |
| Pts | 78-61 | 56-35 |
| Total Points | 139 | 91 |
| Winners | 37 | 26 |
| %Winners | 47% | 46% |
Both Purcell and Jung played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Purcell and Jung have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Purcell played 6 games more than Jung. The Australian scored 37 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese struck 26 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Purcell | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 49/63 | 36/51 |
| %1st in | 78% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 37/49 | 26/36 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 11/15 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 73% |
Purcell blasted 3 aces . Jung didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Purcell won 76% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 73% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Purcell | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 75% | 80% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Jason broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Jung was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Purcell | |||
| Q1 Samuel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 78-61 | 78-61 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 49/63 | 49/63 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 37/49 | 37/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Nedovesov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 56-35 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/51 | 36/51 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLWWL
LWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andy MurrayMurray – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jay ClarkeClarke (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Jason JungJung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Denis KudlaKudla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Marius CopilCopil (0-1) – H2H and prediction
