Francisco Comesana and Lukas Neumayer will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Prostejov Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francisco Comesana who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Francisco Comesana is the pick to win this match.
Francisco Comesana -> 1.57
Lukas Neumayer -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Francisco Comesana vs. Lukas Neumayer
There is no head to head record between Francisco Comesana and Lukas Neumayer since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Francisco Comesana
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-16 | 1-2 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-25 | 2-2 | 57-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-18 | 2-2 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-15 | 0-0 | 49-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 7-6 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, Francisco reached the qualifications after defeating Peter Fajta 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Fajta (6-3 6-2). During the match, Comesana scored 70 points vs Fajta’s 48. The Argentine was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Comesana scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Francisco Comesana lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Comesana put 71% of his first serves in, winning 66% (21/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Fajta 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Comesana has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (156-83). 17-6 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Comesana has an aggregate147-74 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Francisco’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Punta Cana.
Comesana has an aggregate 19-7 win-loss record in 2022, 17-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prostejov Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Lukas Neumayer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-19 | 2-2 | 13-16 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-32 | 2-1 | 38-28 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-26 | 12-4 | 41-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-25 | 8-10 | 16-14 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 434 (career-high), Lukas got to the qualifications after beating Daniel Siniakov 4-6 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications against Siniakov, Neumayer recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-0). During the match Neumayer scored 94 points vs Siniakov’s 76. The Austrian was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Neumayer managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Lukas Neumayer lost the serve twice and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Neumayer put 61% of his first serves in, winning 75% (41/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (14/35) on the 2nd serve. Neumayer broke Siniakov 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Lukas’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Antalya.
The Austrian has a composed 26-9 win-loss record in 2022, 21-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Comesana | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 24 |
| Pts | 70-48 | 94-76 |
| Total Points | 118 | 170 |
| Winners | 21 | 41 |
| %Winners | 30% | 44% |
Both Comesana and Neumayer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Lukas Neumayer lost 1 set while Francisco Comesana hasn’t conceded a set so far. Comesana has played 1 set(s) less than Neumayer (2 vs 3). Therefore, Comesana played 7 games less than Neumayer. Francisco scored 21 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Lukas bagged 41 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Comesana | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 55/90 |
| %1st in | 71% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 41/55 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 14/35 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 40% |
Comesana recorded 1 ace . Neumayer also fired 4 aces . Comesana won 66% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Neumayer won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Comesana | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 46% | 55% |
| Conceded | 3 | 14 |
| Saved | 1 | 12 |
| % Saved | 33% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Comesana broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Comesana surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Lukas broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Neumayer conceded his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Comesana | |||
| Q1 Fajta |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 70-48 | 70-48 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 32/45 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Neumayer | |||
| Q1 Siniakov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 94-76 | 94-76 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 55/90 | 55/90 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 41/55 | 41/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/35 | 14/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 12/14 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLWWW
LLWLWWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Andrej MartinMartin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Martin CuevasCuevas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
