Rudolf Molleker and Maks Kasnikowski will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rudolf Molleker who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rudolf Molleker is the pick to win this match.
Rudolf Molleker -> 1.33
Maks Kasnikowski -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. Maks Kasnikowski
There is no head to head record between Rudolf Molleker and Maks Kasnikowski since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Rudolf Molleker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-19 | 4-4 | 7-9 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 454, Molleker got to the qualifications after defeating Steven Diez 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Molleker had a good straight sets win against Diez (6-1 6-4). During the match, Molleker scored 62 points vs Diez’s 48. Molleker was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Molleker fired 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Rudolf Molleker lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Molleker put 55% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the 2nd serve. Molleker was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Diez 5 times.
Molleker has a losing win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 49% of his matches (123-126). 17-11 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Molleker has an aggregate85-70 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Molleker’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Split.
The German has an aggregate 17-11 win-loss record in 2022, 17-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Maks Kasnikowski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-17 | 3-4 | 20-10 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 13-6 | 22-14 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-19 | 16-7 | 20-10 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-11 | 7-5 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 806 (career-high), the Pole reached the qualifications after defeating Henri Squire 7-66 3-0 ret..
In the qualifications, Maks had a good straight sets win against Squire (7-66 3-0 ret.). During the match Kasnikowski scored 66 points vs Squire’s 51. Maks was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Kasnikowski couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Maks Kasnikowski was quite efficient on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kasnikowski broke Squire 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Maks’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Bengaluru.
Maks has a composed 8-7 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Molleker | Kasnikowski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 |
| Pts | 62-48 | 66-51 |
| Total Points | 110 | 117 |
| Winners | 23 | 21 |
| %Winners | 37% | 32% |
Both Molleker and Kasnikowski played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Molleker has played 1 set(s) less than Kasnikowski (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Molleker played 1 game more than Kasnikowski. Molleker scored 23 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Kasnikowski blasted 21 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Molleker | Kasnikowski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 0 |
| 1st in | 33/60 | 26/48 |
| %1st in | 55% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 21/26 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 59% |
Molleker scored 4 aces . Kasnikowski didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Molleker won 70% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Kasnikowski won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Molleker | Kasnikowski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/5 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 100% | 33% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Rudolf broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. The German surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Kasnikowski broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Pole conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Molleker | |||
| Q1 Diez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-48 | 62-48 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 33/60 | 33/60 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kasnikowski | |||
| Q1 Squire |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 3-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 66-51 | 66-51 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/48 | 26/48 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWLL
LWWWWWLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Timo StodderStodder (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Attila BalazsBalazs – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Gonzalo LamaLama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Lucas GerchGerch (2-0) – H2H and prediction
