Daniel Dutra Da Silva and Timo Stodder will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:00 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Dutra Da Silva who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Dutra Da Silva -> 1.63
Timo Stodder -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs. Timo Stodder
This will be the 3rd time that Daniel Dutra Da Silva and Timo Stodder square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Dutra Da Silva and Stodder (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Dutra Da Silva won 6-3 6-7(4) 10-3 in the qualifications in M25 Wroclaw back in 2021.
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-35 | 0-0 | 41-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 52-35 | 7-3 | 45-32 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-28 | 7-1 | 24-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-37 | 1-3 | 24-34 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-21 | 2-1 | 44-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 273, Daniel got to the qualifications after defeating Jeremy Jahn 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Jahn (6-1 6-4). During the match, Dutra Da Silva scored 66 points vs Jahn’s 42. The Brazilian was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Dutra Da Silva was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Daniel Dutra Da Silva was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daniel broke Jahn 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Dutra Da Silva has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (332-199). 16-16 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Dutra Da Silva has a compiled 310-183 match record in the last years on clay.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger and the Vicenza Challenger.
Daniel has a compiled 17-17 win-loss record in 2022, 16-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Timo Stodder
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-34 | 0-1 | 40-31 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-15 | 4-4 | 29-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 483, the German got to the qualifications after beating Alexey Vatutin 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Vatutin (6-3 6-3). During the match Stodder scored 63 points vs Vatutin’s 48. Stodder was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Stodder fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Timo Stodder lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Stodder put 55% of his first serves in, winning 74% (25/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Vatutin 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The German’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Weston and M15 Antalya.
Stodder has a composed 21-10 win-loss record in 2022, 21-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Dutra Da Silva | Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 66-42 | 63-48 |
| Total Points | 108 | 111 |
| Winners | 20 | 25 |
| %Winners | 30% | 40% |
Both Dutra Da Silva and Stodder played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Dutra Da Silva and Stodder have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Dutra Da Silva played 1 game less than Stodder. The Brazilian scored 20 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Timo fired 25 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Dutra Da Silva | Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 26/49 | 34/62 |
| %1st in | 53% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 25/34 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 14/28 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 50% |
Dutra Da Silva didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Stodder bagged 3 aces . Dutra Da Silva won 77% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Stodder won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Dutra Da Silva | Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 40% | 57% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Dutra Da Silva surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Timo broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Timo conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Dutra Da Silva | |||
| Q1 Jahn | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-42 | 66-42 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/49 | 26/49 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Stodder | |||
| Q1 Vatutin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-48 | 63-48 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/62 | 34/62 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Timo StodderStodder (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Attila BalazsBalazs – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Gonzalo LamaLama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Lucas GerchGerch (2-0) – H2H and prediction