Ernests Gulbis and Moez Echargui will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Vicenza Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ernests Gulbis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ernests Gulbis is the pick to win this match.
Ernests Gulbis -> 1.46
Moez Echargui -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ernests Gulbis vs. Moez Echargui
There is no head to head record between Ernests Gulbis and Moez Echargui since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ernests Gulbis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-21 | 3-2 | 17-13 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-21 | 2-4 | 6-9 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-13 | 9-4 | 3-6 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2019 | 8-30 | 3-9 | 1-9 | 4-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 360, Ernests got to the qualifications after defeating Giulio Colacioppo 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Ernests had a good straight sets win against Colacioppo (6-1 6-3). During the match, Gulbis scored 59 points vs Colacioppo’s 39. Ernests was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gulbis fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ernests Gulbis was very efficient on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Gulbis broke Colacioppo 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Gulbis has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (212-193). 3-3 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gulbis has a compiled 69-68 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Ernests’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Cherbourg Challenger.
Ernests has a compiled 11-9 win-loss record in 2022, 3-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vicenza Challenger
Gulbis has never competed in this tournament before.
Moez Echargui
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-16 | 9-10 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-34 | 23-10 | 23-22 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 7-2 | 37-26 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 38-17 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-14 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 431, Moez got to the qualifications after beating Arthur Reymond 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Tunisian had a good straight sets win against Reymond (6-2 6-4). During the match Echargui scored 68 points vs Reymond’s 56. Moez was pretty aggressive to blast 16 winners.
About the serving games, Echargui was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Moez Echargui lost the serve 3 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Echargui put 54% of his first serves in, winning 42% (16/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 69% (22/32) on the 2nd serve. Echargui broke Reymond 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
The Tunisian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Monastir.
The Tunisian has a composed 13-12 win-loss record in 2022, 6-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gulbis | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
| Pts | 59-39 | 68-56 |
| Total Points | 98 | 124 |
| Winners | 23 | 16 |
| %Winners | 39% | 24% |
Both Gulbis and Echargui played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gulbis and Echargui have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gulbis played 2 games less than Echargui. Ernests scored 23 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Echargui managed to score 16 winners (24%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gulbis | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 27/49 | 38/70 |
| %1st in | 55% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 16/38 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 42% |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 22/32 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 69% |
Gulbis managed to score 3 aces . Echargui didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gulbis won 85% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Echargui won 42% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gulbis | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 14 |
| Saved | 5 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Latvian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Latvian had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points. Echargui broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Echargui conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gulbis | |||
| Q1 Colacioppo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-39 | 59-39 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/49 | 27/49 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Echargui | |||
| Q1 Reymond |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 68-56 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 24% | 24% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/70 | 38/70 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 16/38 | 16/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 42% | 42% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/32 | 22/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 11/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Filippo BaldiBaldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Riccardo BalzeraniBalzerani (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Yan BondarevskiyBondarevskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
