H2H, PREDICTION Illya Marchenko vs Evan Zhu | Shymkent 2 Challenger odds, preview, pick

PREVIEW. Shymkent 2 Challenger. Marchenko and Zhu will clash against each other in the quarter of the Shymkent 2 Challenger. See the prediction, H2H stats, odds, and preview of their upcoming match

Prediction and head to head Illya Marchenko vs. Evan Zhu

Illya Marchenko and Evan Zhu will play each other in the quarter of the Shymkent 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:30 am on COURT 11. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Illya Marchenko who should win in 3 sets.

See updated oddsAs per the initial odds, Illya Marchenko is the pick to win this match.
Illya Marchenko -> 1.86
Evan Zhu -> 1.94

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

See Updated Draw
Bonus
Sports

Prediction and head to head Illya Marchenko vs. Evan Zhu

There is no head to head record between Illya Marchenko and Evan Zhu since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.

Illya Marchenko

Illya Marchenko
Illya Marchenko

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
538
High
49
LLLLLLLLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 8-22 6-13 0-1 2-6 0-2 0-0
2023 42-22 17-5 6-6 18-10 1-1 0-0
2022 21-25 9-10 3-4 8-9 1-2 0-0
2021 37-28 5-7 2-5 26-12 4-4 0-0
2020 15-14 0-3 0-2 15-8 0-0 0-1

Ranked no. 252, Illya reached the quarter after beating Saba Purtseladze 6-4 6-2 and Gabriel Decamps 6-1 6-1.

In the 2nd round, Illya had a good straight sets win against Decamps (6-1 6-1). During the match, Marchenko scored 52 points vs Decamps’s 25. Illya was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.

Regarding the service games, Marchenko blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Illya Marchenko was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 67% (6/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Ukrainian broke Decamps 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Marchenko hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 63% of the points he played.

Marchenko has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (281-218). 3-2 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Marchenko has a compiled 20-31 win-loss record in the last years on clay.

The Ukrainian has an aggregate 7-8 win-loss record in 2022, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Shymkent 2 Challenger

Marchenko
Shymkent 2 Challenger
Marchenko's Record

Evan Zhu

Evan Zhu
Evan Zhu

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
691
High
271
LWWLWWLWWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 24-22 22-16 1-4 1-2 0-0 0-0
2023 31-32 21-21 9-7 1-3 0-1 0-0
2022 44-31 14-13 25-12 5-5 0-1 0-0
2021 13-20 9-15 4-4 0-1 0-0 0-0
2020 11-6 5-3 6-2 0-1 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 463 (career-high), the American got to the quarter after beating Roman Konovalov 6-2 6-0, Matteo Donati 7-63 6-2, Antoine Bellier 6-3 6-4 and Beibit Zhukayev 6-2 6-3.

In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Zhukayev (6-2 6-3). During the match Zhu scored 74 points vs Zhukayev’s 58. Evan was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.

Talking about serving, Zhu blasted 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Evan Zhu lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Zhu put 58% of his first serves in, winning 78% (36/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (12/33) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Zhukayev 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Evan started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 59% of the points he played.

Zhu’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Naples and M15 Sunrise.

Evan has a composed 29-11 win-loss record in 2022, 23-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Zhu
Shymkent 2 Challenger
Zhu's Record
Bonus
Sports

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

I.Marchenko
E.Zhu
2h:01
2h:01
Time on court​
!
4h:35
4h:35
!
0h:44
0h:44
Last match​
1h:19
1h:19
2
2
Match played
!
4
4
32
32
Games Played​
71
71
4
4
Set played​​
8
8
110
110
Total points​
269
269
55
55
Avg point​
67.3
67.3
41
41
Winners
105
105
20.5
20.5
Avg Winners​
26.3
26.3
37%
37%
Ratio winners
39%
39%
-- Serve --
7
7
Aces
16
16
3.5
3.5
Avg Aces
4
4
2
2
Double Faults
9
9
1
1
Avg Double Faults
2.3
2.3
41/52
41/52
1st won total​
105/135
105/135
!
79%
79%
1st won %
!
78%
78%
21/33
21/33
2nd won total​
56/97
56/97
!
64%
64%
2nd won %
58%
58%
-- Break Points --
10/15
10/15
BP won
15/27
15/27
5/7.5
5/7.5
Avg BP won
3.8/6.8
3.8/6.8
!
67%
67%
Won
!
56%
56%
6
6
Conceded
13
13
3
3
Avg Conceded
3.3
3.3
2
2
Broken
3
3
1
1
Avg Broken
!
0.8
0.8
4
4
Saved
10
10

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Marchenko Zhu
Match played 2 4
Tot Set 4 8
Tot Games 32 71
Pts 110-64 269-185
Total Points 174 454
Winners 41 105
%Winners 37% 39%

Marchenko played 2 matches while Zhu competed in 4 matches. Zhu started his run from the qualifications while Marchenko had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Marchenko has played 4 set(s) less than Zhu (4 vs 8). Therefore, Marchenko played 39 games less than Zhu. The Ukrainian scored 41 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Evan struck 105 winners (39%).

Serve Performance

Serve Marchenko Zhu
Aces 7 16
Avg per match 3.5 4
1st in 52/85 135/232
%1st in 61% 58%
1st pts 41/52 105/135
%1st pts 79% 78%
2nd pts 21/33 56/97
%2nd pts 64% 58%

Marchenko made 7 aces (3.5 per match). Zhu recorded 16 aces (4 per match). Marchenko won 79% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Zhu won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Marchenko Zhu
Won 10 15
Converted 10/15 15/27
% Converted 67% 56%
Conceded 6 13
Saved 4 10
% Saved 67% 77%
Times Broken 2 3

The Ukrainian broke his opponents 10 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Ukrainian lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Evan broke his opponents 15 times with a 56% conversion rate. Evan conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.

Marchenko
R1
Purtseladze
R2
Decamps
Total
Score 6-4 6-2 6-1 6-1
Tot Set 2 2 4
Tot Games 18 14 32
pts 58-39 52-25 110-64
Total points 97 77 174
Winners 18 23 41
%Winners 31% 44% 37%
SERVE
Aces 1 6 7
Double Faults 1 1 2
1st in 24/48 28/37 52/85
% 1st in 50% 76% 61%
1st pts 18/24 23/28 41/52
% 1st pts 75% 82% 79%
2nd pts 15/24 6/9 21/33
% 2nd pts 63% 67% 64%
Breaks
Won 5 5 10
Converted 5/8 5/7 10/15
Converted % 63% 71% 67%
Conceded 4 2 6
Saved 2/4 2/2 4
Saved % 50% 100% 75%
Times Broken 2 0 2
Zhu
Q1
Konovalov
Q3
Donati
R1
Bellier
R2
Zhukayev
Total
Score 6-2 6-0 7-63 6-2 6-3 6-4 6-2 6-3
Tot Set 2 2 2 2 8
Tot Games 14 21 19 17 71
pts 54-22 69-51 72-54 74-58 269-185
Total points 76 120 126 132 454
Winners 15 23 31 36 105
%Winners 28% 33% 43% 49% 39%
SERVE
Aces 2 4 7 3 16
Double Faults 2 1 0 6 9
1st in 21/37 31/61 37/55 46/79 135/232
% 1st in 57% 51% 67% 58% 58%
1st pts 15/21 23/31 31/37 36/46 105/135
% 1st pts 71% 74% 84% 78% 78%
2nd pts 14/16 18/30 12/18 12/33 56/97
% 2nd pts 88% 60% 67% 36% 58%
Breaks
Won 5 4 2 4 15
Converted 5/8 4/5 2/7 4/7 15/27
Converted % 63% 80% 29% 57% 56%
Conceded 1 3 2 7 13
Saved 1/1 1/3 2/2 6/7 10
Saved % 100% 33% 100% 86% 160%
Times Broken 0 2 0 1 3

Head 2 Head

Win Loss
Marchenko
LLLLLLLLLL
Zhu
LWWLWWLWWW
2024 2023 2022
8 - 22
24 - 22
6-13
Hard
22-16
2-6
I Hard
1-2
0-1
Clay
1-4
See Updated Draw
Sports
Bonus

Upcoming matches in the draw