Lukas Rosol and Johan Nikles will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Gonet Geneva Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Rosol who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lukas Rosol is the pick to win this match.
Lukas Rosol -> 1.61
Johan Nikles -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Rosol vs. Johan Nikles
This will be the 2nd time that Lukas Rosol and Johan Nikles play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Rosol (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Rosol won 6-2 6-1 in the 2nd round in the Amersfoort Challenger back in 2021.
Lukas Rosol
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 13-21 | 4-7 | 9-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-30 | 14-7 | 19-16 | 11-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-26 | 0-2 | 5-14 | 7-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 4-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 35-37 | 8-11 | 9-11 | 11-11 | 7-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 249, Rosol got to the qualifications after defeating Jakub Paul 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Paul (6-2 6-3). During the match, Rosol scored 60 points vs Paul’s 43. Lukas was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Rosol recorded 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lukas Rosol lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Rosol put 71% of his first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (5/12) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Paul 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Rosol has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (296-268). 13-11 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Rosol has a compiled 139-108 record in the last years on clay.
Rosol’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Rosol has an overall 24-15 win-loss record in 2022, 13-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Geneva
Johan Nikles
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 3-2 | 25-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 19-19 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-28 | 1-3 | 42-21 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 294, Johan reached the qualifications after defeating Peter Gojowczyk 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Nikles had a good straight sets win against Gojowczyk (6-3 6-3). During the match Nikles scored 66 points vs Gojowczyk’s 49. The Swiss was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Nikles scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Johan Nikles lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Nikles put 53% of his first serves in, winning 73% (19/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Gojowczyk 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
The Swiss has an aggregate 12-8 win-loss record in 2022, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosol | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 60-43 | 66-49 |
| Total Points | 103 | 115 |
| Winners | 25 | 19 |
| %Winners | 42% | 29% |
Both Rosol and Nikles played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Rosol and Nikles have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Rosol played 1 game less than Nikles. Lukas scored 25 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Nikles bagged 19 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosol | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 30/42 | 26/49 |
| %1st in | 71% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 19/26 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 5/12 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 43% |
Rosol recorded 3 aces . Nikles recorded 1 ace . Rosol won 83% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Nikles won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosol | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 45% | 60% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Lukas conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Nikles broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rosol | |||
| Q1 Paul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-43 | 60-43 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nikles | |||
| Q1 Gojowczyk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/49 | 26/49 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – John MillmanMillman (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo AndujarAndujar – Joao SousaSousa (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Richard BerankisBerankis (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Pablo CuevasCuevas (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Fabio FogniniFognini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alexander BublikBublik (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Lukas RosolRosol (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
