Christopher O Connell and Benjamin Hassan will square off in the qualifications of the Gonet Geneva Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christopher O Connell who should win in 2 sets.
Christopher O Connell -> 1.24
Benjamin Hassan -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Benjamin Hassan
There is no head to head record between Christopher O Connell and Benjamin Hassan since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Christopher O Connell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-28 | 19-15 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-26 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 125, Christopher got to the qualifications after defeating Goncalo Oliveira 7-63 6-4.
In the qualifications, Christopher had a good straight sets win against Oliveira (7-63 6-4). During the match, O Connell scored 83 points vs Oliveira’s 71. Christopher was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, O Connell recorded 5 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Christopher O Connell lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, O Connell put 59% of his first serves in, winning 77% (34/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Oliveira 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
O Connell has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (289-162). 10-3 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, O Connell has an overall 151-72 match record in the last years on clay.
O Connell’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Split Challenger.
The Australian has an overall 19-9 win-loss record in 2022, 10-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Geneva
Christopher has never competed in this tournament before.
Benjamin Hassan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-34 | 13-11 | 11-14 | 1-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-39 | 8-12 | 20-16 | 9-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 327, the German reached the qualifications after defeating Henri Laaksonen 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Hassan had a good straight sets win against Laaksonen (6-4 6-3). During the match Hassan scored 60 points vs Laaksonen’s 53. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Hassan scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Hassan was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (23/31) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Hassan broke Laaksonen 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Manacor.
Hassan has an overall 18-10 win-loss record in 2022, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | O Connell | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 |
| Pts | 83-71 | 60-53 |
| Total Points | 154 | 113 |
| Winners | 34 | 23 |
| %Winners | 41% | 38% |
Both O Connell and Hassan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, O Connell and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, O Connell played 4 games more than Hassan. Christopher scored 34 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Benjamin made 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | O Connell | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 1 |
| 1st in | 44/74 | 31/54 |
| %1st in | 59% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 34/44 | 23/31 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 52% |
O Connell blasted 5 aces . Hassan scored 1 ace . O Connell won 77% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | O Connell | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 33% | 57% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 60% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. O Connell conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Hassan conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| O Connell | |||
| Q1 Oliveira | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 83-71 | 83-71 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 44/74 | 44/74 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 34/44 | 34/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 14/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hassan | |||
| Q1 Laaksonen | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 60-53 | 60-53 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – John MillmanMillman (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo AndujarAndujar – Joao SousaSousa (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Richard BerankisBerankis (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Pablo CuevasCuevas (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Fabio FogniniFognini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alexander BublikBublik (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Lukas RosolRosol (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction