Ramkumar Ramanathan and Joao Menezes will play each other in the qualifications of the Bordeaux Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Joao Menezes who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Joao Menezes is the pick to win this match.
Joao Menezes -> 1.66
Ramkumar Ramanathan -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ramkumar Ramanathan vs. Joao Menezes
There is no head to head record between Ramkumar Ramanathan and Joao Menezes since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-25 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-21 | 25-12 | 0-6 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 15-34 | 4-13 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 4-6 | 1-1 |
2021 | 45-32 | 23-11 | 8-7 | 5-8 | 7-4 | 2-2 |
2020 | 8-18 | 3-8 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 5-2 |
Ranked no. 185, Ramkumar reached the qualifications after beating Pierre Delage 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Delage (7-5 6-4). During the match, Ramanathan scored 68 points vs Delage’s 58. Ramkumar was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ramanathan recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ramkumar Ramanathan lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Ramanathan put 66% of his first serves in, winning 77% (30/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Ramanathan broke Delage 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Ramanathan has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (359-281). 3-4 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ramanathan has a compiled 67-67 record in the last years on clay.
Ramkumar has a compiled 5-12 win-loss record in 2022, 3-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bordeaux Challenger
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Joao Menezes
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-28 | 2-6 | 17-20 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-16 | 1-3 | 7-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 262, the Brazilian reached the qualifications after beating Luca Van Assche 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Joao had a good straight sets win against Van Assche (6-2 6-4). During the match Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes scored 64 points vs Van Assche’s 42. Joao was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes bagged 4 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Joao Menezes was very efficient on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brazilian broke Van Assche 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The Brazilian has a compiled 1-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ramanathan | Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
Pts | 68-58 | 64-42 |
Total Points | 126 | 106 |
Winners | 30 | 27 |
%Winners | 44% | 42% |
Both Ramanathan and Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ramanathan and Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ramanathan played 4 games more than Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes. Ramanathan scored 30 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes bagged 27 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ramanathan | Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 4 |
Avg per match | 4 | 4 |
1st in | 39/59 | 33/47 |
%1st in | 66% | 70% |
1st pts | 30/39 | 27/33 |
%1st pts | 77% | 82% |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/14 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 71% |
Ramanathan scored 4 aces . Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes recorded 4 aces . Ramanathan won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ramanathan | Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/8 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 50% | 50% |
Conceded | 2 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 1 |
% Saved | 0% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Ramanathan broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Indian conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Joao broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Joao was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Ramanathan | |||
Q1 Delage |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 68-58 | 68-58 | |
Total points | 126 | 126 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 39/59 | 39/59 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes | |||
Q1 Van |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 64-42 | 64-42 | |
Total points | 106 | 106 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 33/47 | 33/47 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 27/33 | 27/33 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SousaSousa – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Elias YmerYmer (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Carlos TabernerTaberner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Joao MenezesMenezes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Fernando VerdascoVerdasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction