Brandon Nakashima and Kamil Majchrzak will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on GRAND STAND ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.9
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Kamil Majchrzak
There is no head to head record between Brandon Nakashima and Kamil Majchrzak since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Brandon Nakashima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-30 | 19-14 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 61-32 | 24-12 | 13-7 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 74, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Ugo Humbert 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Humbert (6-3 6-3). During the match, Nakashima scored 64 points vs Humbert’s 40. Nakashima was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nakashima recorded 4 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Brandon Nakashima lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nakashima put 65% of his first serves in, winning 94% (31/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Humbert 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Nakashima has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (111-67). 2-3 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nakashima has an overall10-14 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Brandon has a compiled 8-11 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Kamil Majchrzak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-23 | 19-6 | 12-7 | 5-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 80, Kamil got to the qualifications after defeating Federico Coria 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Coria (6-4 6-2). During the match Majchrzak scored 63 points vs Coria’s 44. Majchrzak was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Majchrzak bagged 6 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Kamil Majchrzak was very effective on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Majchrzak broke Coria 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Kamil’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in Pune.
Kamil has a compiled 12-9 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nakashima | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 64-40 | 63-44 |
| Total Points | 104 | 107 |
| Winners | 31 | 28 |
| %Winners | 48% | 44% |
Both Nakashima and Majchrzak played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nakashima and Majchrzak have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). Brandon scored 31 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole scored 28 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nakashima | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 32/51 |
| %1st in | 65% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 31/33 | 28/32 |
| %1st pts | 94% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 10/19 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 53% |
Nakashima struck 4 aces . Majchrzak made 6 aces . Nakashima won 94% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 88% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nakashima | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 44% | 75% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Nakashima surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Majchrzak broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Majchrzak was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Nakashima | |||
| Q1 Humbert | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-40 | 64-40 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 33/51 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 31/33 | 31/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Majchrzak | |||
| Q1 Coria | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-44 | 63-44 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/51 | 32/51 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 28/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Dominic ThiemThiem (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Marin CilicCilic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Dusan LajovicLajovic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Daniel EvansEvans (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Laslo DjereDjere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – David GoffinGoffin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Jannik SinnerSinner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Christian GarinGarin (0-0) – H2H and prediction