Maximilian Marterer and Martin Krumich will square off in the 2nd round of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maximilian Marterer who should win in 2 sets.
Maximilian Marterer -> 1.32
Martin Krumich -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Maximilian Marterer vs. Martin Krumich
There is no head to head record between Maximilian Marterer and Martin Krumich since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Maximilian Marterer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 22-32 | 5-10 | 11-11 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-27 | 12-10 | 13-10 | 12-4 | 5-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 11-7 | 17-15 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-28 | 4-2 | 15-16 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 209, Marterer reached the 2nd round after defeating Andrew Paulson 7-62 7-66.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Paulson (7-62 7-66). During the match, Marterer scored 95 points vs Paulson’s 80. Marterer was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Marterer fired 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Maximilian Marterer was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (36/42) of his 1st serve and 62% (24/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Paulson once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Marterer has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (296-198). 1-4 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Marterer has an aggregate 135-97 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The German has an aggregate 9-9 win-loss record in 2022, 1-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Martin Krumich
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-28 | 8-4 | 48-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-32 | 0-1 | 25-29 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-11 | 0-0 | 33-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-26 | 3-5 | 23-17 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-30 | 10-3 | 16-17 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 602, Krumich reached the 2nd round after beating Jesper De Jong 7-66 7-66.
In the 1st round, Krumich had a good straight sets win against De Jong (7-66 7-66). During the match Krumich scored 90 points vs De Jong’s 88. Martin was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Krumich blasted 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Martin Krumich lost the serve 5 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Krumich put 45% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (22/49) on the 2nd serve. Krumich broke De Jong 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Krumich has an aggregate 6-7 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Marterer | Krumich |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 |
| Pts | 95-80 | 90-88 |
| Total Points | 175 | 178 |
| Winners | 36 | 28 |
| %Winners | 38% | 31% |
Both Marterer and Krumich played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Marterer and Krumich have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (26). Maximilian scored 36 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Martin recorded 28 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Marterer | Krumich |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 42/81 | 40/89 |
| %1st in | 52% | 45% |
| 1st pts | 36/42 | 28/40 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 24/39 | 22/49 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 45% |
Marterer managed to score 5 aces . Krumich recorded 3 aces . Marterer won 86% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Krumich won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Marterer | Krumich |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 5 |
| Converted | 1/3 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 33% | 71% |
| Conceded | 3 | 13 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Maximilian broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Martin broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Marterer | |||
| R1 Paulson | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 95-80 | 95-80 | |
| Total points | 175 | 175 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 42/81 | 42/81 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 36/42 | 36/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Krumich | |||
| R1 De | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 90-88 | 90-88 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 40/89 | 40/89 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/49 | 22/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 8/13 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 62% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Prague 2 Challenger
- Clement TaburTabur – Max PurcellPurcell (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo DonatiDonati – Kaichi UchidaUchida (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Yshai OlielOliel (2-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Sebastian OfnerOfner (7-63 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Lukas RosolRosol – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-3 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Jesper De JongDe Jong (7-66 7-66) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Lucas GerchGerch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-62 7-66) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mirza BasicBasic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Marius CopilCopil (3-6 7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Matteo DonatiDonati (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Pedro CachinCachin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction