Tristan Lamasine and Clement Tabur will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Lamasine who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Lamasine is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Lamasine -> 1.54
Clement Tabur -> 2.41
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Lamasine vs. Clement Tabur
There is no head to head record between Tristan Lamasine and Clement Tabur since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Lamasine
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-21 | 0-0 | 4-12 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-23 | 4-1 | 23-9 | 30-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 0-0 | 14-18 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-27 | 3-3 | 14-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-16 | 6-3 | 2-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 322, Tristan got to the qualifications after defeating Jakub Mensik 6-0 0-0 ret..
In the qualifications, Lamasine defeated Mensik (6-0 0-0 ret.). During the match, Lamasine scored 31 points vs Mensik’s 17. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 8 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lamasine was unable to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Tristan Lamasine conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Lamasine put 56% of his first serves in, winning 57% (8/14) of the points behind his 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the 2nd serve. Tristan broke Mensik 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Lamasine has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (305-257). 3-4 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lamasine has an aggregate 125-114 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Lamasine has a composed 8-10 win-loss record in 2022, 3-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Clement Tabur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-17 | 0-3 | 14-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 62-25 | 16-7 | 45-14 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-26 | 20-8 | 16-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-22 | 9-4 | 25-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 11-4 | 6-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 398 (career-high), Tabur got to the qualifications after defeating Go Soeda 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Tabur had a good straight sets win against Soeda (6-2 6-4). During the match Tabur scored 62 points vs Soeda’s 51. Clement was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Tabur bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Clement Tabur lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Tabur put 58% of his first serves in, winning 74% (28/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Soeda 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Clement’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Monastir,M25 Faro and M15 Creteil.
The French player has a compiled 22-7 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lamasine | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 6 | 18 |
| Pts | 31-17 | 62-51 |
| Total Points | 48 | 113 |
| Winners | 8 | 28 |
| %Winners | 26% | 45% |
Both Lamasine and Tabur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Lamasine has played 1 set more than Tabur (3 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Lamasine played 12 games less than Tabur. The French player scored 8 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, The French player scored 28 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lamasine | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 14/25 | 38/65 |
| %1st in | 56% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 8/14 | 28/38 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 13/27 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 48% |
Lamasine didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Tabur fired 2 aces . Lamasine won 57% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Tabur won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lamasine | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 80% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Tristan broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The French player extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. Clement broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Tabur conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lamasine | |||
| Q1 Mensik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 0-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 6 | 6 | |
| pts | 31-17 | 31-17 | |
| Total points | 48 | 48 | |
| Winners | 8 | 8 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 8/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Tabur | |||
| Q1 Soeda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-51 | 62-51 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/65 | 38/65 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLWLL
LLLWLLWWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Lucas GerchGerch (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Matteo DonatiDonati (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mirza BasicBasic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Yshai OlielOliel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
