Flavio Cobolli and Franco Agamenone will square off in the semifinal of the Rome 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:30 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Flavio Cobolli who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Flavio Cobolli is the pick to win this match.
Flavio Cobolli -> 1.62
Franco Agamenone -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Flavio Cobolli vs. Franco Agamenone
There is no head to head record between Flavio Cobolli and Franco Agamenone since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Flavio Cobolli
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-18 | 14-7 | 8-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-36 | 10-6 | 43-23 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-34 | 6-4 | 24-21 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-30 | 5-4 | 39-21 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 146, Cobolli reached the semifinal after defeating Borna Coric 4-6 6-3 6-4, Thomas Fabbiano 6-4 6-74 6-2 and Kenny de Schepper 3-6 7-65 6-3.
In the quarter against de Schepper, Flavio recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-3).During the match, Cobolli scored less points (4) than de Schepper. In fact, the world no. 146 won 97 points vs de Schepper’s. That means that Cobolli was more focused during the important points. Flavio was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cobolli scored 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Flavio Cobolli lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Cobolli put 38% of his first serves in, winning 67% (24/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (35/58) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke de Schepper 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian has lost 3 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Cobolli has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (74-53). 14-5 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cobolli has an aggregate59-34 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Cobolli’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Zadar Challenger.
The Italian has an overall 18-10 win-loss record in 2022, 14-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome 1 Challenger
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 1-4 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 176, the Italian reached the semifinal after beating Manuel Guinard 6-3 6-2, Jonathan Eysseric 6-4 2-6 7-5 and Giulio Zeppieri 7-5 6-4.
In the quarter, Agamenone had a good straight sets win against Zeppieri (7-5 6-4). During the match Agamenone scored 74 points vs Zeppieri’s 67. Franco was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Agamenone blasted 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 61% of his first serves in, winning 72% (33/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (11/29) on the 2nd serve. Franco broke Zeppieri 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Agamenone has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Bendigo Challenger.
Agamenone has a composed 11-10 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cobolli | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 91 | 69 |
| Pts | 309-291 | 235-209 |
| Total Points | 600 | 444 |
| Winners | 96 | 91 |
| %Winners | 31% | 39% |
Both Cobolli and Agamenone played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Flavio Cobolli surrendered 3 sets, while Franco Agamenone surrendered 1 set. Cobolli has played 2 sets more than Agamenone (9 vs 7). Therefore, Cobolli played 22 games more than Agamenone. The Italian scored 96 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian struck 91 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cobolli | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5.7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 138/294 | 135/232 |
| %1st in | 47% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 96/138 | 91/135 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 79/156 | 47/97 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 48% |
Cobolli recorded 17 aces (5.7 per match). Agamenone scored 6 aces (2 per match). Cobolli won 70% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Agamenone won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cobolli | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 17 | 14 |
| Converted | 17/42 | 14/31 |
| % Converted | 40% | 45% |
| Conceded | 28 | 21 |
| Saved | 16 | 12 |
| % Saved | 57% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 12 | 9 |
Flavio broke his opponents 17 times with a 40% conversion rate. Flavio lost his serve 12 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 14 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cobolli | |||||
| R1 Coric |
R2 Fabbiano |
1/4 de Schepper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 6-74 6-2 | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 31 | 31 | 91 | |
| pts | 103-95 | 109-95 | 97-101 | 309-291 | |
| Total points | 198 | 204 | 198 | 600 | |
| Winners | 38 | 34 | 24 | 96 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 31% | 25% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 8 | 3 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 6 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 54/104 | 48/96 | 36/94 | 138/294 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 50% | 38% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 38/54 | 34/48 | 24/36 | 96/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 71% | 67% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/50 | 23/48 | 35/58 | 79/156 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 48% | 60% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 4 | 17 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 7/17 | 4/14 | 17/42 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 41% | 29% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28 | |
| Saved | 9/14 | 0/4 | 7/10 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 0% | 70% | 45% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Agamenone | |||||
| R1 Guinard |
R2 Eysseric |
1/4 Zeppieri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 | 22 | 69 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 92-94 | 74-67 | 235-209 | |
| Total points | 117 | 186 | 141 | 444 | |
| Winners | 27 | 31 | 33 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 34% | 45% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 6 | 6 | 21 | |
| 1st in | 36/61 | 53/96 | 46/75 | 135/232 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 55% | 61% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 31/53 | 33/46 | 91/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 58% | 72% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/25 | 26/43 | 11/29 | 47/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 60% | 38% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 4/6 | 5/8 | 14/31 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 67% | 63% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 | 5 | 21 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5/9 | 2/5 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 56% | 40% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWLWW
LLWLLLWWWL Tennis Scores in Rome 1 Challenger
- Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (3-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jesper De JongDe Jong (4-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Jesper De Jong/Bart StevensDe Jong/Bart Stevens – Enzo Couacaud/Manuel GuinardCouacaud/Manuel Guinard (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (3-6 7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Quentin HalysHalys – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
