Quentin Halys and Jesper De Jong will clash against each other in the quarter of the Rome 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:30 am on CAMPO 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quentin Halys who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Quentin Halys is the pick to win this match.
Quentin Halys -> 1.83
Jesper De Jong -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Quentin Halys and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Quentin Halys
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-16 | 3-5 | 7-8 | 5-3 | 3-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-26 | 11-13 | 10-6 | 3-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 57-26 | 5-7 | 9-4 | 32-10 | 6-5 | 5-0 |
| 2021 | 35-27 | 14-8 | 10-9 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 13-18 | 3-2 | 2-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 102 (career-high), the French player reached the quarter after beating Enzo Couacaud 7-610 6-4 and Michael Geerts 7-61 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Quentin had a good straight sets win against Geerts (7-61 6-3). During the match, Halys scored 83 points vs Geerts’s 61. Quentin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Halys fired 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Quentin Halys was pretty efficient on serve to win 90% (36/40) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Quentin broke Geerts twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French player hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Halys has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (302-237). 2-0 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Halys has a composed 77-72 match record in the last years on clay.
The French player best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Forli 3 Challenger,the Pau Challenger,the Turin Challenger and the Lille Challenger.
Halys has a compiled 29-8 win-loss record in 2022, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome 1 Challenger
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177 (career-high), De reached the quarter after defeating Andrey Kuznetsov 6-2 6-1 and Matteo Arnaldi 6-1 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Jesper defeated Arnaldi (6-1 3-6 6-3). During the match De scored 92 points vs Arnaldi’s 74. De was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, De managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jesper De Jong was quite effective on serve to win 76% (31/41) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. De broke Arnaldi 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
De has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
De’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Traralgon Challenger.
De has a compiled 11-10 win-loss record in 2022, 6-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Halys | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 40 |
| Pts | 166-141 | 150-106 |
| Total Points | 307 | 256 |
| Winners | 67 | 53 |
| %Winners | 40% | 35% |
Both Halys and De played 2 matches. At the moment, Jesper De Jong conceded 1 set while Quentin Halys hasn’t conceded a set so far. Halys has played 1 set(s) less than De (4 vs 5). However, it’s interesting to notice that Halys played 5 games more than De. Halys scored 67 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch blasted 53 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Halys | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 90/154 | 67/116 |
| %1st in | 58% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 67/90 | 53/67 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 38/64 | 29/49 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 59% |
Halys blasted 11 aces (5.5 per match). De made 5 aces (2.5 per match). Halys won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, De won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Halys | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/16 | 8/20 |
| % Converted | 31% | 40% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 1 |
| % Saved | 80% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Quentin broke his opponents 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. Halys surrendered his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. De broke his opponents 8 times with a 40% conversion rate. Jesper conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Halys | ||||
| R1 Couacaud |
R2 Geerts |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-610 6-4 | 7-61 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 22 | 45 | |
| pts | 83-80 | 83-61 | 166-141 | |
| Total points | 163 | 144 | 307 | |
| Winners | 31 | 36 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 43% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 50/88 | 40/66 | 90/154 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 61% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 31/50 | 36/40 | 67/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 90% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/38 | 14/26 | 38/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 54% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 2/9 | 5/16 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 22% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 3/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 100% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| De | ||||
| R1 Kuznetsov |
R2 Arnaldi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 25 | 40 | |
| pts | 58-32 | 92-74 | 150-106 | |
| Total points | 90 | 166 | 256 | |
| Winners | 22 | 31 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/41 | 41/75 | 67/116 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 55% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 31/41 | 53/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 76% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 19/34 | 29/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 56% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/12 | 8/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 33% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 33% | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWWLLWW
LWWWWWWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
