Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Facundo Diaz Acosta will play each other in the 2nd round of the Buenos Aires 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 6:00 pm on COURT DIEGO SCHWARTZMAN. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Camilo Ugo Carabelli who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Camilo Ugo Carabelli is the pick to win this match.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli -> 1.4
Facundo Diaz Acosta -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs. Facundo Diaz Acosta
This will be the 3rd time that Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Facundo Diaz Acosta play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Ugo Carabelli and Diaz Acosta (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Ugo Carabelli won 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the qualifications in Cordoba back in 2021.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 58-30 | 6-5 | 52-24 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-26 | 0-2 | 41-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-24 | 3-4 | 36-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-24 | 4-2 | 39-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 18-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 175, Ugo Carabelli got to the 2nd round after beating Facundo Juarez 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Juarez (6-2 6-4). During the match, Ugo Carabelli scored 60 points vs Juarez’s 44. Camilo was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ugo Carabelli was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Camilo Ugo Carabelli lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ugo Carabelli put 51% of his first serves in, winning 63% (17/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the 2nd serve. Camilo broke Juarez 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Ugo Carabelli has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (221-127). 10-6 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ugo Carabelli has a compiled194-107 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Ugo Carabelli’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger.
Camilo has a compiled 13-9 win-loss record in 2022, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Buenos Aires 2 Challenger
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-22 | 3-8 | 16-10 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 50-25 | 4-4 | 46-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-21 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-30 | 7-4 | 36-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 22-12 | 10-7 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 325, Facundo reached the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Cukierman 6-3 3-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Argentine defeated Cukierman (6-3 3-6 6-1). During the match Diaz Acosta scored 85 points vs Cukierman’s 67. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Diaz Acosta made 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Facundo Diaz Acosta lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Diaz Acosta put 51% of his first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (21/36) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Cukierman 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
The Argentine’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Buenos Aires Challenger.
The Argentine has an aggregate 8-4 win-loss record in 2022, 8-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ugo Carabelli | Diaz Acosta |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
Pts | 60-44 | 85-67 |
Total Points | 104 | 152 |
Winners | 17 | 25 |
%Winners | 28% | 29% |
Both Ugo Carabelli and Diaz Acosta played 1 match. At the moment, Facundo Diaz Acosta lost 1 set while Camilo Ugo Carabelli hasn’t lost a set so far. Ugo Carabelli has played 1 set(s) less than Diaz Acosta (2 vs 3). Therefore, Ugo Carabelli played 7 games less than Diaz Acosta. Camilo scored 17 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Diaz Acosta recorded 25 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ugo Carabelli | Diaz Acosta |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 4 |
Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
1st in | 27/53 | 37/73 |
%1st in | 51% | 51% |
1st pts | 17/27 | 25/37 |
%1st pts | 63% | 68% |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 21/36 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 58% |
Ugo Carabelli didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Diaz Acosta recorded 4 aces . Ugo Carabelli won 63% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Diaz Acosta won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ugo Carabelli | Diaz Acosta |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/11 | 6/12 |
% Converted | 45% | 50% |
Conceded | 4 | 8 |
Saved | 2 | 4 |
% Saved | 50% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Camilo broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Argentine surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Diaz Acosta broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Diaz Acosta conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Ugo Carabelli | |||
R1 Juarez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 60-44 | 60-44 | |
Total points | 104 | 104 | |
Winners | 17 | 17 | |
%Winners | 28% | 28% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 27/53 | 27/53 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 17/27 | 17/27 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Diaz Acosta | |||
R1 Cukierman |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 85-67 | 85-67 | |
Total points | 152 | 152 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 29% | 29% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 37/73 | 37/73 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 21/36 | 21/36 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Buenos Aires 2 Challenger
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Renzo OlivoOlivo (4-6 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Luciano DarderiDarderi (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-1) – H2H and prediction