Chun Hsin Tseng and Evan Furness will face off in the 2nd round of the Ostrava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chun Hsin Tseng who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chun Hsin Tseng is the pick to win this match.
Chun Hsin Tseng -> 1.38
Evan Furness -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chun Hsin Tseng vs. Evan Furness
There is no head to head record between Chun Hsin Tseng and Evan Furness since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Chun Hsin Tseng
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-17 | 7-7 | 25-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-25 | 9-8 | 12-15 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 11-12 | 28-11 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-25 | 9-8 | 30-15 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 7-5 | 4-4 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119 (career-high), Hsin Tseng reached the 2nd round after defeating Pavel Nejedly 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Nejedly (6-2 6-4). During the match, Hsin Tseng scored 71 points vs Nejedly’s 55. The Chinese was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hsin Tseng couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Chun Hsin Tseng lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Hsin Tseng put 50% of his first serves in, winning 67% (18/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Nejedly 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Hsin Tseng has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (150-88). 15-3 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hsin Tseng has an overall62-35 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Hsin Tseng’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Bengalaru 1 Challenger,the Roseto Degli Abruzzi 2 Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
Chun has a composed 20-7 win-loss record in 2022, 15-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ostrava Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Evan Furness
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-18 | 3-2 | 9-13 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-15 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-31 | 2-3 | 16-12 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-27 | 14-1 | 26-20 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 37-10 | 34-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 278, Furness got to the 2nd round after defeating Martin Krumich 6-3 6-3, Sem Verbeek 6-1 6-2 and Lukas Lacko 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Evan had a good straight sets win against Lacko (6-1 6-1). During the match Furness scored 62 points vs Lacko’s 39. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 17 winners.
About the serving games, Furness struck 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Evan Furness lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Furness put 50% of his first serves in, winning 61% (17/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Lacko 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Evan has a compiled 22-13 win-loss record in 2022, 8-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hsin Tseng | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 47 |
| Pts | 71-55 | 188-131 |
| Total Points | 126 | 319 |
| Winners | 18 | 53 |
| %Winners | 25% | 28% |
Hsin Tseng played 1 match while Furness competed in 3 matches. Furness started his run from the qualifications while Hsin Tseng had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Hsin Tseng has played 4 set(s) less than Furness (2 vs 6). Therefore, Hsin Tseng played 29 games less than Furness. Chun scored 18 winners (25% of the total points). On the other side, Furness managed to score 53 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hsin Tseng | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 27/54 | 81/166 |
| %1st in | 50% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 18/27 | 53/81 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 52/85 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 61% |
Hsin Tseng didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Furness struck 5 aces (1.7 per match). Hsin Tseng won 67% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Furness won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hsin Tseng | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 15 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 15/21 |
| % Converted | 45% | 71% |
| Conceded | 4 | 12 |
| Saved | 2 | 9 |
| % Saved | 50% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Hsin Tseng broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Chinese lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 15 times with a 71% conversion rate. Furness conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hsin Tseng | |||
| R1 Nejedly |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 71-55 | 71-55 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/54 | 27/54 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 18/27 | 18/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Furness | |||||
| Q1 Krumich |
Q3 Verbeek |
R1 Lacko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 15 | 14 | 47 | |
| pts | 66-54 | 60-38 | 62-39 | 188-131 | |
| Total points | 120 | 98 | 101 | 319 | |
| Winners | 19 | 17 | 17 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 28% | 27% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 28/67 | 25/43 | 28/56 | 81/166 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 58% | 50% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 19/28 | 17/25 | 17/28 | 53/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | 61% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 15/18 | 17/28 | 52/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 83% | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 6 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/5 | 6/9 | 15/21 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 80% | 67% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 | 6 | 12 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 0/0 | 5/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 83% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLLW
LWLLWWLLLW Tennis Scores in Ostrava Challenger
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Dennis NovakNovak (6-2 2-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-1 5-7 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 4-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
