Jason Jung and Alex Rybakov will square off in the 2nd round of the Savannah Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on LANDINGS CLUB STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alex Rybakov who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alex Rybakov is the pick to win this match.
Alex Rybakov -> 1.64
Jason Jung -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Alex Rybakov
There is no head to head record between Jason Jung and Alex Rybakov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 226, Jung reached the 2nd round after beating Emilio Gomez 6-2 4-4 ret..
In the 1st round, Jung defeated Gomez (6-2 4-4 ret.). During the match, Jung scored 61 points vs Gomez’s 54. Jung was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jung managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 63% of his first serves in, winning 55% (22/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the 2nd serve. Jung broke Gomez 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Jung has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (310-247). 1-2 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Jung has a compiled 27-26 record in the last years on clay.
The Chinese has an aggregate 6-10 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Savannah Challenger
Jung has never competed in this tournament before.
Alex Rybakov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-13 | 4-4 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-25 | 5-8 | 7-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-23 | 5-7 | 20-12 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-26 | 4-4 | 35-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 24-9 | 12-5 | 9-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 373, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Kaichi Uchida 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Alex had a good straight sets win against Uchida (6-3 6-2). During the match Rybakov scored 66 points vs Uchida’s 42. Rybakov was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Rybakov made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Alex Rybakov was pretty efficient on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Rybakov broke Uchida 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
The American has an aggregate 10-11 win-loss record in 2022, 6-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 |
| Pts | 61-54 | 66-42 |
| Total Points | 115 | 108 |
| Winners | 22 | 28 |
| %Winners | 36% | 42% |
Both Jung and Rybakov played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Jung has played 1 set more than Rybakov (3 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Jung played 1 game less than Rybakov. Jason scored 22 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Rybakov managed to score 28 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 32/52 |
| %1st in | 63% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 22/40 | 28/32 |
| %1st pts | 55% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 12/20 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 60% |
Jung bagged 2 aces . Rybakov made 6 aces . Jung won 55% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Rybakov won 88% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 71% | 25% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 57% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Jason broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Jung | |||
| R1 Gomez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-4 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-54 | 61-54 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 40/64 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Rybakov | |||
| R1 Uchida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-42 | 66-42 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/52 | 32/52 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 28/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LLWLLWLLWL Tennis Scores in Savannah Challenger
- Jose PereiraPereira – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Aidan MayoMayo (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Noah RubinRubin (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Jack SockSock – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (6-3 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-64 6-0) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Nicola KuhnKuhn (4-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-2 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Learner TienTien (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Emilio GomezGomez (6-2 4-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jack SockSock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Jose PereiraPereira (0-0) – H2H and prediction
