Evan Furness and Sem Verbeek will square off in the qualifications of the Ostrava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Evan Furness who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Evan Furness is the pick to win this match.
Evan Furness -> 1.112
Sem Verbeek -> 6.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Evan Furness vs. Sem Verbeek
There is no head to head record between Evan Furness and Sem Verbeek since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Evan Furness
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-18 | 3-2 | 9-13 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-15 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-31 | 2-3 | 16-12 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-27 | 14-1 | 26-20 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 37-10 | 34-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 284, Evan reached the qualifications after beating Martin Krumich 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Evan had a good straight sets win against Krumich (6-3 6-3). During the match, Furness scored 66 points vs Krumich’s 54. Evan was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Furness scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 5 double faults. Evan Furness lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Furness put 42% of his first serves in, winning 68% (19/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (20/39) on the 2nd serve. Furness broke Krumich 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Furness has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (165-110). 6-4 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Furness has an aggregate53-45 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Furness has an overall 20-13 win-loss record in 2022, 6-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ostrava Challenger
Sem Verbeek
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-3 | 2-2 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 9-15 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 884, the Dutch reached the qualifications after beating Georgii Kravchenko 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Verbeek had a good straight sets win against Kravchenko (6-2 6-4). During the match Verbeek scored 69 points vs Kravchenko’s 53. Verbeek was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Verbeek struck 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sem Verbeek lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Verbeek put 58% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Kravchenko 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The Dutch has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Furness | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 66-54 | 69-53 |
| Total Points | 120 | 122 |
| Winners | 19 | 23 |
| %Winners | 29% | 33% |
Both Furness and Verbeek played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Furness and Verbeek have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). Evan scored 19 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch struck 23 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Furness | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 28/67 | 35/60 |
| %1st in | 42% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 19/28 | 23/35 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 14/25 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 56% |
Furness bagged 1 ace . Verbeek also scored 3 aces . Furness won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Verbeek won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Furness | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 63% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Verbeek broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Furness | |||
| Q1 Krumich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 66-54 | 66-54 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 28/67 | 28/67 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 42% | |
| 1st pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 20/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Verbeek | |||
| Q1 Kravchenko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-53 | 69-53 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 35/60 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Sanjar FayzievFayziev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Attila BalazsBalazs – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Kacper ZukZuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Zizou BergsBergs (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vaclav SafranekSafranek – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Pavel NejedlyNejedly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Dmitry PopkoPopko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Sem VerbeekVerbeek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
