![Prediction And Head To Head Tomas Martin Etcheverry Vs. Michael Mmoh Wo7brxbz1l Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Michael Mmoh](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Tomas-Martin-Etcheverry-vs.-Michael-Mmoh-WO7brxbz1L.jpg)
Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Michael Mmoh will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 8:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.44
Michael Mmoh -> 2.79
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Michael Mmoh
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Michael Mmoh since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-24 | 6-8 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-29 | 8-11 | 25-14 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 53-33 | 4-5 | 48-25 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 63-29 | 0-2 | 62-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 26-15 | 0-1 | 24-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 95 (career-high), Tomas reached the 2nd round after defeating Jason Jung 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Jung (6-3 6-2). During the match, Martin Etcheverry scored 57 points vs Jung’s 38. The Argentine was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martin Etcheverry fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tomas Martin Etcheverry lost the serve once. Furthermore, Martin Etcheverry put 86% of his first serves in, winning 71% (27/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (3/6) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Jung 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Martin Etcheverry has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (239-118). 19-8 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Martin Etcheverry has an aggregate213-100 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Martin Etcheverry’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Concepcion 2 Challenger and the Mexico City Challenger.
Tomas has a composed 22-10 win-loss record in 2022, 19-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Michael Mmoh
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 198, Michael got to the 2nd round after beating Sumit Nagal 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Mmoh had a good straight sets win against Nagal (6-3 6-0). During the match Mmoh scored 60 points vs Nagal’s 31. Michael was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Mmoh recorded 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Michael Mmoh was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Michael broke Nagal 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Mmoh’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger.
The American has a composed 16-10 win-loss record in 2022, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2018 and 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Martin Etcheverry | Mmoh |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 17 | 15 |
Pts | 57-38 | 60-31 |
Total Points | 95 | 91 |
Winners | 27 | 21 |
%Winners | 47% | 35% |
Both Martin Etcheverry and Mmoh played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Martin Etcheverry and Mmoh have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Martin Etcheverry played 2 games more than Mmoh. Tomas scored 27 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 21 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Martin Etcheverry | Mmoh |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 38/44 | 28/44 |
%1st in | 86% | 64% |
1st pts | 27/38 | 21/28 |
%1st pts | 71% | 75% |
2nd pts | 3/6 | 9/16 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 56% |
Martin Etcheverry recorded 2 aces . Mmoh scored 3 aces . Martin Etcheverry won 71% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Martin Etcheverry | Mmoh |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/8 |
% Converted | 83% | 63% |
Conceded | 1 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Martin Etcheverry broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Martin Etcheverry dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Mmoh broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Mmoh conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Martin Etcheverry | |||
R1 Jung |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 57-38 | 57-38 | |
Total points | 95 | 95 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 38/44 | 38/44 | |
% 1st in | 86% | 86% | |
1st pts | 27/38 | 27/38 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Mmoh | |||
R1 Nagal |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 60-31 | 60-31 | |
Total points | 91 | 91 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 28/44 | 28/44 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Gonzalo LamaLama (7-62 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Emilio GomezGomez (6-0 6-71 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 0-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction