Emilio Nava and Sanjar Fayziev will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Prague 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.14
Sanjar Fayziev -> 5.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Sanjar Fayziev
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Sanjar Fayziev since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 362, Emilio got to the qualifications after defeating Jakub Nicod 7-5 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Emilio defeated Nicod (7-5 3-6 6-4). During the match, Nava scored 107 points vs Nicod’s 99. The American was very aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nava fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Emilio Nava lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 71% of his first serves in, winning 75% (48/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Nicod 3 times after converting 18% of his break points (3/17).
Nava has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 63% of his matches (84-50). 1-1 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nava has an overall36-15 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Emilio has a composed 12-8 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 1 Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Sanjar Fayziev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-16 | 5-5 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-20 | 3-4 | 11-8 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2019 | 31-21 | 8-8 | 12-8 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 602, Fayziev reached the qualifications after beating Ergi Kirkin 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Fayziev had a good straight sets win against Kirkin (6-4 6-3). During the match Fayziev scored 68 points vs Kirkin’s 49. Fayziev was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Fayziev was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sanjar Fayziev lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Fayziev put 75% of his first serves in, winning 69% (29/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the 2nd serve. Sanjar broke Kirkin 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Uzbek has an aggregate 4-7 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 19 |
| Pts | 107-99 | 68-49 |
| Total Points | 206 | 117 |
| Winners | 48 | 29 |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% |
Both Nava and Fayziev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Emilio Nava surrendered 1 set while Sanjar Fayziev hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nava has played 1 set more than Fayziev (3 vs 2). Therefore, Nava played 12 games more than Fayziev. The American scored 48 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Uzbek fired 29 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 0 |
| 1st in | 64/90 | 42/56 |
| %1st in | 71% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 48/64 | 29/42 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 12/26 | 10/14 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 71% |
Nava managed to score 7 aces . Fayziev didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nava won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Fayziev won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/17 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 18% | 44% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Emilio broke his opponent 3 times with a 18% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Sanjar broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Sanjar conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Nicod |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 107-99 | 107-99 | |
| Total points | 206 | 206 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 64/90 | 64/90 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 48/64 | 48/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/26 | 12/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/17 | 3/17 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 18% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Fayziev | |||
| Q1 Kirkin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-49 | 68-49 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/56 | 42/56 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 29/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Filip HoranskyHoransky (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sanjar FayzievFayziev – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Dennis NovakNovak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
