Pedja Krstin and Adrian Menendez-Maceiras will square off in the qualifications of the Aguascalientes Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CANCHA LA HUERTA. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pedja Krstin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pedja Krstin is the pick to win this match.
Pedja Krstin -> 1.72
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Pedja Krstin vs. Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
This will be the 4th time that Pedja Krstin and Adrian Menendez-Maceiras clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Menendez-Maceiras (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Krstin won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in Barcelona back in 2016.
Pedja Krstin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-28 | 5-13 | 6-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-26 | 1-5 | 10-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-15 | 4-4 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 27-32 | 6-12 | 21-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 317, Krstin got to the qualifications after beating Mateus Alves 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Alves (6-4 7-5). During the match, Krstin scored 70 points vs Alves’s 59. The Serbian was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krstin struck 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Pedja Krstin lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Krstin put 62% of his first serves in, winning 82% (32/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (9/24) on the 2nd serve. Krstin broke Alves 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Krstin has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (301-230). 5-5 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Krstin has an aggregate 185-136 match record in the last years on clay.
Pedja has an overall 5-6 win-loss record in 2022, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Aguascalientes Challenger
Krstin has never competed in this tournament before.
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-19 | 13-8 | 6-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-24 | 12-10 | 2-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-9 | 3-4 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-32 | 8-13 | 9-6 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 385, Adrian reached the qualifications after beating Jakub Paul 7-66 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Paul (7-66 6-1). During the match Menendez-Maceiras scored 76 points vs Paul’s 57. Adrian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Menendez-Maceiras fired 7 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Adrian Menendez-Maceiras lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Menendez-Maceiras put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Paul 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Adrian has a compiled 2-7 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krstin | Menendez-Maceiras |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 20 |
| Pts | 70-59 | 76-57 |
| Total Points | 129 | 133 |
| Winners | 32 | 31 |
| %Winners | 46% | 41% |
Both Krstin and Menendez-Maceiras played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Krstin and Menendez-Maceiras have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Krstin played 2 games more than Menendez-Maceiras. The Serbian scored 32 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Adrian recorded 31 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krstin | Menendez-Maceiras |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 7 |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 44/65 |
| %1st in | 62% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 31/44 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 9/24 | 14/21 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 67% |
Krstin managed to score 11 aces . Menendez-Maceiras struck 7 aces . Krstin won 82% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Menendez-Maceiras won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krstin | Menendez-Maceiras |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 40% | 38% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Pedja broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Spaniard broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krstin | |||
| Q1 Alves |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-59 | 70-59 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 39/63 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/24 | 9/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Menendez-Maceiras | |||
| Q1 Paul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 76-57 | 76-57 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 44/65 | 44/65 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuichi SugitaSugita – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Matias ZukasZukas (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian LenzLenz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedja KrstinKrstin – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jc AragoneAragone – Akira SantillanSantillan (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – Denis IstominIstomin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (1-1) – H2H and prediction
