Mikael Torpegaard and Andrew Harris will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mikael Torpegaard who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mikael Torpegaard is the pick to win this match.
Mikael Torpegaard -> 1.37
Andrew Harris -> 2.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mikael Torpegaard vs. Andrew Harris
This will be the 2nd time that Mikael Torpegaard and Andrew Harris face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Harris (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Harris won 7-6(0) 7-6(4) in the 1st round in the Lexington Challenger back in 2018.
Mikael Torpegaard
7 - 10win/loss
667
166
LLLWLLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8-15 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-23 | 6-12 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-8 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2019 | 34-23 | 10-9 | 3-5 | 20-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 22-12 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 330, Mikael got to the qualifications after beating Max Jacob Schnur 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Mikael had a good straight sets win against Jacob Schnur (6-1 6-0). During the match, Torpegaard scored 55 points vs Jacob Schnur’s 22. Mikael was exceptionally aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Torpegaard blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mikael Torpegaard was quite effective on serve to win 81% (17/21) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mikael broke Jacob Schnur 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Torpegaard has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (142-99). 2-2 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Torpegaard has a compiled47-22 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Dane has an aggregate 6-10 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Andrew Harris
12 - 10win/loss
681
159
LLWLWLWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 14-13 | 7-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 39-27 | 31-20 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| 2018 | 24-19 | 18-16 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 420, Andrew reached the qualifications after defeating Naoki Nakagawa 7-68 7-64.
In the qualifications, Harris had a good straight sets win against Nakagawa (7-68 7-64). During the match Harris scored 93 points vs Nakagawa’s 88. Harris was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
About the serving games, Harris struck 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Andrew Harris was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (45/58) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Nakagawa once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Andrew’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Bendigo.
The Australian has a compiled 12-9 win-loss record in 2022, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Torpegaard | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 26 |
| Pts | 55-22 | 93-88 |
| Total Points | 77 | 181 |
| Winners | 17 | 45 |
| %Winners | 31% | 48% |
Both Torpegaard and Harris played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Torpegaard and Harris have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Torpegaard played 13 games less than Harris. Mikael scored 17 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Andrew struck 45 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Torpegaard | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 21/39 | 58/88 |
| %1st in | 54% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 17/21 | 45/58 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 16/30 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 53% |
Torpegaard recorded 3 aces . Harris recorded 7 aces . Torpegaard won 81% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Harris won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Torpegaard | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 1 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 1/5 |
| % Converted | 63% | 20% |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Torpegaard broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Mikael very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Australian broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. Andrew conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Torpegaard | |||
| Q1 Jacob |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 55-22 | 55-22 | |
| Total points | 77 | 77 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 21/39 | 21/39 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 17/21 | 17/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 13/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Harris | |||
| Q1 Nakagawa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 93-88 | 93-88 | |
| Total points | 181 | 181 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 58/88 | 58/88 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 45/58 | 45/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonathan MridhaMridha – Donald YoungYoung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Andrew HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Andrea CollariniCollarini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Cristian RodriguezRodriguez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
