Jeff Wolf and Alexis Galarneau will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Sarasota Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:00 pm on ELIZABETH MOORE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.31
Alexis Galarneau -> 3.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Alexis Galarneau
There is no head to head record between Jeff Wolf and Alexis Galarneau since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jeff Wolf
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-15 | 2-6 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 16-13 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 23-15 | 8-4 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-11 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-10 | 11-3 | 0-1 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Aleksandar Kovacevic 6-2 6-78 6-3.
In the 1st round, Jeff defeated Kovacevic (6-2 6-78 6-3). During the match, Wolf scored 108 points vs Kovacevic’s 89. Wolf was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wolf recorded 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jeff Wolf was quite effective on serve to win 82% (40/49) of his 1st serve and 56% (24/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kovacevic 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Wolf has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (107-68). 2-1 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Wolf has a composed3-5 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Jeff’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Phoenix Challenger.
The American has an overall 17-11 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Jeff has never competed in this tournament before.
Alexis Galarneau
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-12 | 9-5 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-26 | 20-18 | 3-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 12-7 | 9-9 | 18-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 13-9 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-3 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 323, Alexis got to the 2nd round after beating Alex Lawson 6-3 6-2, Victor Lilov 6-1 7-5 and Juan Ignacio Londero 6-3 1-0 ret..
In the 1st round, Alexis had a good straight sets win against Londero (6-3 1-0 ret.). During the match Galarneau scored 35 points vs Londero’s 24. The Canadian was extremely aggressive to blast 11 winners.
Talking about serving, Galarneau scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Alexis Galarneau lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Galarneau put 66% of his first serves in, winning 58% (11/19) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (5/10) on the 2nd serve. Galarneau broke Londero 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Alexis has a composed 15-7 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wolf | Galarneau |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 46 |
| Pts | 108-89 | 170-126 |
| Total Points | 197 | 296 |
| Winners | 40 | 61 |
| %Winners | 37% | 36% |
Wolf played 1 match while Galarneau competed in 3 matches. Galarneau started his run from the qualifications while Wolf had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jeff Wolf conceded 1 set while Alexis Galarneau hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Wolf has played 4 set(s) less than Galarneau (3 vs 7). Therefore, Wolf played 16 games less than Galarneau. Wolf scored 40 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian fired 61 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wolf | Galarneau |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 49/92 | 91/154 |
| %1st in | 53% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 40/49 | 61/91 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 24/43 | 30/63 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 48% |
Wolf managed to score 8 aces . Galarneau made 5 aces (1.7 per match). Wolf won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Galarneau won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wolf | Galarneau |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 14/36 |
| % Converted | 44% | 39% |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 9 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Jeff broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Jeff conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Canadian broke his opponents 14 times with a 39% conversion rate. Galarneau conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wolf | |||
| R1 Kovacevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-78 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 108-89 | 108-89 | |
| Total points | 197 | 197 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 49/92 | 49/92 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 40/49 | 40/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/43 | 24/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Galarneau | |||||
| Q1 Lawson |
Q3 Lilov |
R1 Londero |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 7-5 | 6-3 1-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 | 10 | 46 | |
| pts | 60-44 | 75-58 | 35-24 | 170-126 | |
| Total points | 104 | 133 | 59 | 296 | |
| Winners | 22 | 28 | 11 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | 31% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 28/58 | 44/67 | 19/29 | 91/154 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 66% | 66% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 28/44 | 11/19 | 61/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 64% | 58% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 10/23 | 5/10 | 30/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 43% | 50% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/20 | 4/8 | 14/36 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 30% | 50% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 | 2 | 15 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 4/7 | 0/2 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 57% | 0% | 140% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWWLWWLL
LWLWWLWWLL Tennis Scores in Sarasota Challenger
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 1-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (3-6 6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-3 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-4 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Michael MmohMmoh (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Jack SockSock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
