![Prediction And Head To Head Jack Sock Vs. Gijs Brouwer 1im6hotjct Prediction and head to head Jack Sock vs. Gijs Brouwer](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Jack-Sock-vs.-Gijs-Brouwer-1iM6hotJcT.jpg)
Jack Sock and Gijs Brouwer will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Sarasota Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:30 pm on ELIZABETH MOORE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Sock who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Sock is the pick to win this match.
Jack Sock -> 1.51
Gijs Brouwer -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Sock vs. Gijs Brouwer
There is no head to head record between Jack Sock and Gijs Brouwer since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jack Sock
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-21 | 5-8 | 8-4 | 7-5 | 13-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-16 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-6 | 8-4 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 1-8 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 139, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Christian Harrison 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Harrison (6-4 6-4). During the match, Sock scored 70 points vs Harrison’s 61. Sock was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sock blasted 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jack Sock was quite efficient on serve to win 84% (26/31) of his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jack broke Harrison twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Sock has a positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (230-174). 1-1 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sock has a compiled 48-34 match record in the last years on clay.
The American has an aggregate 9-6 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Gijs Brouwer
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-20 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 4-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-34 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 47-27 | 12-5 | 13-5 | 14-12 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-25 | 9-5 | 12-10 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 13-4 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 286 (career-high), Brouwer got to the 2nd round after defeating Jonathan Mridha 6-2 6-4, Max Purcell 4-6 6-2 6-3 and Mikael Torpegaard 6-74 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round against Torpegaard, Gijs recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-4 6-1). During the match Brouwer scored 107 points vs Torpegaard’s 84. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Brouwer bagged 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Gijs Brouwer lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Brouwer put 65% of his first serves in, winning 70% (42/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (19/32) on the 2nd serve. Gijs broke Torpegaard 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Brouwer’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Portimao.
Brouwer has a compiled 20-9 win-loss record in 2022, 7-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sock | Brouwer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
Tot Games | 20 | 75 |
Pts | 70-61 | 274-213 |
Total Points | 131 | 487 |
Winners | 26 | 121 |
%Winners | 37% | 44% |
Sock played 1 match while Brouwer competed in 3 matches. Brouwer started his run from the qualifications while Sock had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Gijs Brouwer lost 2 sets while Jack Sock hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sock has played 6 set(s) less than Brouwer (2 vs 8). Therefore, Sock played 55 games less than Brouwer. Jack scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Brouwer blasted 121 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sock | Brouwer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 14 |
Avg per match | 6 | 4.7 |
1st in | 31/68 | 158/231 |
%1st in | 46% | 68% |
1st pts | 26/31 | 121/158 |
%1st pts | 84% | 77% |
2nd pts | 21/37 | 38/73 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 52% |
Sock blasted 6 aces . Brouwer fired 14 aces (4.7 per match). Sock won 84% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sock | Brouwer |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 12 |
Converted | 2/5 | 12/24 |
% Converted | 40% | 50% |
Conceded | 3 | 15 |
Saved | 3 | 11 |
% Saved | 100% | 73% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Jack broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Jack pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. Brouwer broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gijs conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
Sock | |||
R1 Harrison |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 70-61 | 70-61 | |
Total points | 131 | 131 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 31/68 | 31/68 | |
% 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 21/37 | 21/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Brouwer | |||||
Q1 Mridha |
Q3 Purcell |
R1 Torpegaard |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | 6-74 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 30 | 75 | |
pts | 71-49 | 96-80 | 107-84 | 274-213 | |
Total points | 120 | 176 | 191 | 487 | |
Winners | 33 | 46 | 42 | 121 | |
%Winners | 46% | 48% | 39% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 8 | 4 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | |
1st in | 39/50 | 59/89 | 60/92 | 158/231 | |
% 1st in | 78% | 66% | 65% | 68% | |
1st pts | 33/39 | 46/59 | 42/60 | 121/158 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 78% | 70% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 6/11 | 13/30 | 19/32 | 38/73 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 43% | 59% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 4/10 | 5/9 | 12/24 | |
Converted % | 60% | 40% | 56% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 9 | 5 | 15 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 7/9 | 3/5 | 11 | |
Saved % | 100% | 78% | 60% | 238% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Sarasota Challenger
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (3-6 6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-3 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-4 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 1-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Michael MmohMmoh (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Jack SockSock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction