Altug Celikbilek and Pedro Cachin will square off in the 2nd round of the Madrid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on PISTA 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pedro Cachin who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pedro Cachin is the pick to win this match.
Pedro Cachin -> 1.285
Altug Celikbilek -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Altug Celikbilek vs. Pedro Cachin
There is no head to head record between Altug Celikbilek and Pedro Cachin since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Altug Celikbilek
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-27 | 8-12 | 0-3 | 9-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-30 | 13-13 | 4-7 | 10-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-24 | 23-11 | 1-2 | 15-8 | 3-2 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 14-10 | 3-2 | 7-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, Celikbilek got to the 2nd round after defeating Nikola Milojevic 7-64 7-5.
In the 1st round, Altug had a good straight sets win against Milojevic (7-64 7-5). During the match, Celikbilek scored 87 points vs Milojevic’s 78. Altug was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Celikbilek bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Altug Celikbilek lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Celikbilek put 53% of his first serves in, winning 77% (34/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (19/39) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke Milojevic 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Celikbilek has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (262-176). 1-0 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Celikbilek has a composed26-27 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Turk has a compiled 6-6 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Madrid Challenger
The Turk has never competed in this tournament before.
Pedro Cachin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-19 | 0-5 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-32 | 4-8 | 28-19 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-22 | 5-4 | 41-13 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-0 | 47-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 212, the Argentine reached the 2nd round after beating Javier Barranco Cosano 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cachin defeated Barranco Cosano (6-4 4-6 6-4). During the match Cachin scored 95 points vs Barranco Cosano’s 88. Cachin was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Cachin struck 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Pedro Cachin lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Cachin put 53% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (23/43) on the 2nd serve. Pedro broke Barranco Cosano 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Pedro’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Marbella Challenger.
Pedro has a composed 13-7 win-loss record in 2022, 11-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Celikbilek | Cachin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 30 |
| Pts | 87-78 | 95-88 |
| Total Points | 165 | 183 |
| Winners | 34 | 33 |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% |
Both Celikbilek and Cachin played 1 match. At the moment, Pedro Cachin lost 1 set while Altug Celikbilek hasn’t lost a set so far. Celikbilek has played 1 set(s) less than Cachin (2 vs 3). Therefore, Celikbilek played 5 games less than Cachin. Celikbilek scored 34 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine fired 33 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Celikbilek | Cachin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 9 |
| 1st in | 44/83 | 48/91 |
| %1st in | 53% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 34/44 | 33/48 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 19/39 | 23/43 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 53% |
Celikbilek scored 3 aces . Cachin scored 9 aces . Celikbilek won 77% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Cachin won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Celikbilek | Cachin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 38% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 71% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Turk broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Turk surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Celikbilek | |||
| R1 Milojevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 87-78 | 87-78 | |
| Total points | 165 | 165 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 44/83 | 44/83 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 34/44 | 34/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/39 | 19/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Cachin | |||
| R1 Barranco |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 95-88 | 95-88 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 48/91 | 48/91 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/43 | 23/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWL
LLWWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Madrid Challenger
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Feliciano LopezLopez (w/o) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Timofey SkatovSkatov (4-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Yshai OlielOliel (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Pedro SousaSousa (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Johan NiklesNikles (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Gastao EliasElias (w/o) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (3-6 7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Miguel DamasDamas (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Pavel KotovKotov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Lucas PouillePouille (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
