Max Purcell and Gijs Brouwer will square off in the qualifications of the Sarasota Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gijs Brouwer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gijs Brouwer is the pick to win this match.
Gijs Brouwer -> 1.83
Max Purcell -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Max Purcell vs. Gijs Brouwer
There is no head to head record between Max Purcell and Gijs Brouwer since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Max Purcell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-19 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-28 | 45-17 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 21-15 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-14 | 13-9 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Sho Shimabukuro 6-4 7-66.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Shimabukuro (6-4 7-66). During the match, Purcell scored 79 points vs Shimabukuro’s 76. Purcell was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Purcell made 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Max Purcell lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Purcell put 62% of his first serves in, winning 74% (39/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (14/32) on the 2nd serve. Max broke Shimabukuro 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Purcell has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (183-138). 3-1 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Purcell has an aggregate23-12 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Purcell has a composed 9-8 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Gijs Brouwer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-19 | 4-5 | 6-5 | 4-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-34 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-27 | 12-5 | 13-5 | 14-12 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 9-5 | 12-10 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 13-4 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 361, the Dutch reached the qualifications after defeating Jonathan Mridha 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Mridha (6-2 6-4). During the match Brouwer scored 71 points vs Mridha’s 49. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Brouwer fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Gijs Brouwer was extremely efficient on serve to win 85% (33/39) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Gijs broke Mridha 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The Dutch’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Portimao.
Brouwer has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2022, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Purcell | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 18 |
| Pts | 79-76 | 71-49 |
| Total Points | 155 | 120 |
| Winners | 39 | 33 |
| %Winners | 49% | 46% |
Both Purcell and Brouwer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Purcell and Brouwer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Purcell played 5 games more than Brouwer. The Australian scored 39 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Brouwer made 33 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Purcell | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 39/50 |
| %1st in | 62% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 33/39 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 6/11 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 55% |
Purcell managed to score 7 aces . Brouwer made 2 aces . Purcell won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Purcell | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 75% | 60% |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Max broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Purcell surrendered his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Brouwer broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Gijs was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Purcell | |||
| Q1 Shimabukuro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 79-76 | 79-76 | |
| Total points | 155 | 155 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 53/85 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 39/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 14/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Brouwer | |||
| Q1 Mridha |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 71-49 | 71-49 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/50 | 39/50 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 33/39 | 33/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWLW
LLWLWWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Andrea CollariniCollarini (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Alexander RitschardRitschard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Andrew HarrisHarris (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Jason JungJung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
