Sam Querrey and Michael Mmoh will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the US Men’s Clay Court Championship for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sam Querrey who should win in 3 sets.
Sam Querrey -> 1.72
Michael Mmoh -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sam Querrey vs. Michael Mmoh
There is no head to head record between Sam Querrey and Michael Mmoh since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Sam Querrey
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8-14 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-16 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 26-17 | 7-10 | 3-1 | 8-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 24-23 | 12-14 | 3-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 114, Sam reached the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Elahi Galan 7-60 3-6 7-66.
In the 1st round, Sam defeated Elahi Galan Riveros (7-60 3-6 7-66).During the match, Querrey scored less points (4) than Elahi Galan Riveros. In fact, the world no. 114 won 113 points vs Elahi Galan Riveros’s. That means that Querrey was more focused during the important points. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Regarding the service games, Querrey scored 15 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Sam Querrey lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Querrey put 55% of his first serves in, winning 75% (54/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (28/60) on the 2nd serve. Querrey broke Elahi Galan Riveros once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Querrey has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (223-183). 1-0 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Querrey has a compiled 32-33 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Sam has an overall 2-5 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Houston
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-16 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 226, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Sadio Doumbia 6-2 6-72 4-1 ret..
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger.
The American has an overall 13-9 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Querrey | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 26 |
| Pts | 113-117 | 89-69 |
| Total Points | 230 | 158 |
| Winners | 54 | 36 |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% |
Both Querrey and Mmoh played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Sam Querrey surrendered 1 set, while Michael Mmoh dropped 1 set. Querrey has played 1 set(s) less than Mmoh (3 vs 4). However, it’s interesting to notice that Querrey played 9 games more than Mmoh. The American scored 54 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Mmoh managed to score 36 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Querrey | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 6 |
| 1st in | 72/132 | 51/72 |
| %1st in | 55% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 54/72 | 36/51 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 28/60 | 12/21 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 57% |
Querrey bagged 15 aces . Mmoh managed to score 6 aces . Querrey won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Querrey | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 6 |
| Converted | 1/5 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 20% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 57% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Sam broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. Querrey lost his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Mmoh broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Querrey | |||
| R1 Elahi Galan Riveros | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-60 3-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 113-117 | 113-117 | |
| Total points | 230 | 230 | |
| Winners | 54 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 72/132 | 72/132 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 54/72 | 54/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/60 | 28/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Mmoh | ||||
| Q1 Doumbia | Q3 Krueger | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-72 4-1 ret. | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 18 | 44 | |
| pts | 89-69 | – | 89-69 | |
| Total points | 158 | 0 | 158 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | ||
| %Winners | 40% | 0% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | ||
| 1st in | 51/72 | / | 51/72 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 0% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 36/51 | / | 36/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 0% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | / | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 0% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 6/12 | / | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | ||
| Saved | 1/4 | 0/ | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | ||
Tennis Scores in Houston
- Cristian GarinGarin – Jack SockSock (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Denis KudlaKudla (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Steven DiezDiez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Christian HarrisonHarrison (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Marcos GironGiron (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (7-60 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Feliciano LopezLopez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (5-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (6-74 7-65 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Max PurcellPurcell (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Marcos GironGiron (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Max PurcellPurcell (7-6(7) 6-3) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Jack SockSock (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Christian HarrisonHarrison (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – John IsnerIsner (6-4) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Tommy PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Pablo CuevasCuevas (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Jeff WolfWolf (0-1) – H2H and prediction