Gage Brymer and Felix Corwin will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Salinas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Felix Corwin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Felix Corwin is the pick to win this match.
Felix Corwin -> 1.77
Gage Brymer -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gage Brymer vs. Felix Corwin
There is no head to head record between Gage Brymer and Felix Corwin since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Gage Brymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18-30 | 18-27 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-36 | 41-31 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 62-35 | 62-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 527, Gage got to the qualifications after beating Patricio Alvarado 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Brymer had a good straight sets win against Alvarado (6-2 6-1). During the match, Brymer scored 62 points vs Alvarado’s 37. Brymer was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brymer couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Gage Brymer was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (18/23) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Brymer broke Alvarado 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Brymer has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (171-110). 10-9 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Brymer has an aggregate170-108 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
The American has an overall 10-9 win-loss record in 2022, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salinas Challenger
Felix Corwin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-12 | 1-2 | 11-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-13 | 8-3 | 15-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-14 | 9-5 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-30 | 24-20 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 21-15 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 586, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Juan Jose Ycaza 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Corwin had a good straight sets win against Jose Ycaza (6-0 6-0). During the match Corwin scored 49 points vs Jose Ycaza’s 17. Felix was extremely aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about serving, Corwin scored 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Felix Corwin was extremely efficient on serve to win 94% (16/17) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Felix broke Jose Ycaza 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Naples.
Felix has an overall 11-6 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salinas Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brymer | Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 12 |
| Pts | 62-37 | 49-17 |
| Total Points | 99 | 66 |
| Winners | 18 | 16 |
| %Winners | 29% | 33% |
Both Brymer and Corwin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Brymer and Corwin have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Brymer played 3 games more than Corwin. The American scored 18 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Corwin fired 16 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brymer | Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 23/38 | 17/30 |
| %1st in | 61% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 16/17 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 94% |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 8/13 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 62% |
Brymer didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Corwin recorded 3 aces . Brymer won 78% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Corwin won 94% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brymer | Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 43% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Brymer broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Gage dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Brymer | |||
| Q1 Alvarado |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 62-37 | 62-37 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 23/38 | 23/38 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 18/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Corwin | |||
| Q1 Jose |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 49-17 | 49-17 | |
| Total points | 66 | 66 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 16/17 | 16/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Jose StathamStatham (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jc AragoneAragone – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Felix CorwinCorwin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte – Saketh-Sai MyneniMyneni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Cayetano MarchMarch (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Benjamin LockLock (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Facundo JuarezJuarez (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Conner Huertas Del PinoHuertas Del Pino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
