Gabriel Decamps and Edoardo Lavagno will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Sanremo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edoardo Lavagno who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Edoardo Lavagno is the pick to win this match.
Edoardo Lavagno -> 1.7
Gabriel Decamps -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gabriel Decamps vs. Edoardo Lavagno
There is no head to head record between Gabriel Decamps and Edoardo Lavagno since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Gabriel Decamps
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-11 | 14-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 20-19 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 23-15 | 8-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 46-12 | 24-6 | 20-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 366 (career-high), the Brazilian reached the qualifications after defeating Simon Carr 7-5 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Brazilian had a good straight sets win against Carr (7-5 7-5). During the match, Decamps scored 88 points vs Carr’s 78. Gabriel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Decamps scored 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Gabriel Decamps lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Decamps put 59% of his first serves in, winning 69% (37/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. The Brazilian broke Carr 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Decamps has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 69% of his matches (100-45). 1-0 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Decamps has an aggregate56-26 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Brazilian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Vilnius and M25 Vale do Lobo.
Decamps has a compiled 13-7 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sanremo Challenger
Decamps has never competed in this tournament before.
Edoardo Lavagno
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-31 | 0-1 | 48-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-29 | 0-0 | 53-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 61-18 | 0-0 | 61-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 426 (career-high), Lavagno reached the qualifications after defeating Riccardo Balzerani 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Balzerani (6-3 6-2). During the match Lavagno scored 63 points vs Balzerani’s 47. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Lavagno blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Edoardo Lavagno lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lavagno put 69% of his first serves in, winning 73% (29/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (6/18) on the 2nd serve. Lavagno broke Balzerani 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Lavagno’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Cairo,M15 Punta Cana and M15 Marrakech.
Lavagno has an overall 24-6 win-loss record in 2022, 24-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Decamps | Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 17 |
| Pts | 88-78 | 63-47 |
| Total Points | 166 | 110 |
| Winners | 37 | 29 |
| %Winners | 42% | 46% |
Both Decamps and Lavagno played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Decamps and Lavagno have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Decamps played 7 games more than Lavagno. Decamps scored 37 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian recorded 29 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Decamps | Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 54/92 | 40/58 |
| %1st in | 59% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 37/54 | 29/40 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 19/38 | 6/18 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 33% |
Decamps managed to score 4 aces . Lavagno blasted 2 aces . Decamps won 69% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Lavagno won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Decamps | Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 67% | 45% |
| Conceded | 10 | 4 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Brazilian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Brazilian lost his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Edoardo broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Lavagno conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Decamps | |||
| Q1 Carr |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 88-78 | 88-78 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 54/92 | 54/92 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 37/54 | 37/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/38 | 19/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Lavagno | |||
| Q1 Balzerani |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-47 | 63-47 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/18 | 6/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWLW
WWWWWLWLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Jelle SelsSels (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Alexey VatutinVatutin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Damien WengerWenger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FortiForti – Gianluca MagerMager (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Nerman FaticFatic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Mathieu PerchicotPerchicot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
