Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Pedja Krstin will play each other in the quarter of the Pereira Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.06
Pedja Krstin -> 9.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Pedja Krstin
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Pedja Krstin since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-30 | 7-10 | 19-13 | 5-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-29 | 8-11 | 25-14 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-33 | 4-5 | 48-25 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-29 | 0-2 | 62-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 26-15 | 0-1 | 24-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 108 (career-high), Tomas reached the quarter after beating Juan Sebastian Gomez 6-4 7-5 and Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues Alves 6-1 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Martin Etcheverry had a good straight sets win against Meligeni Rodrigues Alves (6-1 7-5). During the match, Martin Etcheverry scored 82 points vs Meligeni Rodrigues Alves’s 56. Tomas was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martin Etcheverry fired 4 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tomas Martin Etcheverry was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (23/32) of his 1st serve and 82% (18/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Martin Etcheverry broke Meligeni Rodrigues Alves 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Martin Etcheverry hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 58% of the points he played.
Martin Etcheverry has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (233-116). 13-6 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Martin Etcheverry has a compiled207-98 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Concepcion 2 Challenger.
The Argentine has a compiled 16-8 win-loss record in 2022, 13-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pereira Challenger
Tomas has never competed in this tournament before.
Pedja Krstin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-28 | 5-13 | 6-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-26 | 1-5 | 10-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-15 | 4-4 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 27-32 | 6-12 | 21-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 332, Krstin got to the quarter after defeating Goncalo Oliveira 3-6 6-4 6-3 and Roberto Quiroz 7-67 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Quiroz (7-67 6-4). During the match Krstin scored 79 points vs Quiroz’s 75. Krstin was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Krstin fired 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Pedja Krstin was extremely efficient on serve to win 76% (34/45) of his 1st serve and 54% (22/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Serbian broke Quiroz twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Krstin has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Krstin has an aggregate 3-3 win-loss record in 2022, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin Etcheverry | Krstin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 51 |
| Pts | 161-119 | 169-163 |
| Total Points | 280 | 332 |
| Winners | 51 | 71 |
| %Winners | 32% | 42% |
Both Martin Etcheverry and Krstin played 2 matches. At the moment, Pedja Krstin surrendered 1 set while Tomas Martin Etcheverry hasn’t conceded a set so far. Martin Etcheverry has played 1 set(s) less than Krstin (4 vs 5). Therefore, Martin Etcheverry played 10 games less than Krstin. The Argentine scored 51 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian struck 71 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin Etcheverry | Krstin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 8.5 |
| 1st in | 65/113 | 96/177 |
| %1st in | 58% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 51/65 | 71/96 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 32/48 | 41/81 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 51% |
Martin Etcheverry bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Krstin fired 17 aces (8.5 per match). Martin Etcheverry won 78% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Krstin won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin Etcheverry | Krstin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/24 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 29% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 50% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Martin Etcheverry broke his opponents 7 times with a 29% conversion rate. Martin Etcheverry surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Serbian broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Krstin conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Martin Etcheverry | ||||
| R1 Sebastian Gomez |
R2 Meligeni Rodrigues Alves |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 41 | |
| pts | 79-63 | 82-56 | 161-119 | |
| Total points | 142 | 138 | 280 | |
| Winners | 28 | 23 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 28% | 32% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/59 | 32/54 | 65/113 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 59% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 23/32 | 51/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 72% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 18/22 | 32/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 82% | 67% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/15 | 7/24 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 27% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 67% | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Krstin | ||||
| R1 Oliveira |
R2 Quiroz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | 7-67 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 23 | 51 | |
| pts | 90-88 | 79-75 | 169-163 | |
| Total points | 178 | 154 | 332 | |
| Winners | 37 | 34 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 10 | 7 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 51/91 | 45/86 | 96/177 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 52% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 37/51 | 34/45 | 71/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 76% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 22/41 | 41/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/4 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 2/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 67% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedja KrstinKrstin – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
