Daniil Medvedev and Jenson Brooksby will face off in the 4th round of the Miami Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Medvedev who should win in 2 sets.
Daniil Medvedev -> 1.185
Jenson Brooksby -> 5.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Medvedev vs. Jenson Brooksby
There is no head to head record between Daniil Medvedev and Jenson Brooksby since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniil Medvedev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-23 | 20-12 | 6-4 | 10-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-21 | 28-9 | 11-5 | 1-5 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-18 | 38-8 | 10-3 | 11-4 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-19 | 26-8 | 3-2 | 8-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-13 | 33-5 | 5-3 | 18-3 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 2, Daniil got to the 4th round after beating Andy Murray 6-4 6-2 and Pedro Martinez Portero 6-3 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Daniil had a good straight sets win against Martinez Portero (6-3 6-4). During the match, Medvedev scored 65 points vs Martinez Portero’s 48. Daniil was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Medvedev blasted 14 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Daniil Medvedev was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (31/39) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daniil broke Martinez Portero 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Russian hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Medvedev has a fantastic match record in the last 10 years having won 70% of his matches (394-165). 15-4 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Medvedev has a composed 170-58 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Medvedev’s best result of the current year was getting to the final at the Australian Open .
The Russian has an aggregate 15-4 win-loss record in 2022, 15-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Jenson Brooksby
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-23 | 10-10 | 9-4 | 1-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-23 | 16-10 | 2-4 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-12 | 26-8 | 8-1 | 11-2 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 39 (career-high), Brooksby got to the 4th round after defeating Federico Coria 3-6 6-2 6-3, Nikoloz Basilashvili 6-3 6-1 and Roberto Bautista Agut 6-3 5-7 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Jenson defeated Bautista-Agut (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match Brooksby scored 97 points vs Bautista-Agut’s 93. Brooksby was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Brooksby struck 8 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jenson Brooksby lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Brooksby put 59% of his first serves in, winning 63% (36/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the 2nd serve. Brooksby broke Bautista-Agut 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Dallas.
Jenson has a compiled 12-4 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medvedev | Brooksby |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 73 |
| Pts | 125-89 | 243-208 |
| Total Points | 214 | 451 |
| Winners | 58 | 95 |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% |
Medvedev played 2 matches while Brooksby competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Jenson Brooksby conceded 2 sets while Daniil Medvedev hasn’t lost a set so far. Medvedev has played 4 set(s) less than Brooksby (4 vs 8). Therefore, Medvedev played 36 games less than Brooksby. Daniil scored 58 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Jenson recorded 95 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medvedev | Brooksby |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 71/105 | 142/231 |
| %1st in | 68% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 58/71 | 95/142 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 43/89 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 48% |
Medvedev managed to score 18 aces (9 per match). Brooksby made 16 aces (5.3 per match). Medvedev won 82% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Brooksby won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medvedev | Brooksby |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 19 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 19/29 |
| % Converted | 50% | 66% |
| Conceded | 3 | 20 |
| Saved | 2 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 45% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 11 |
Daniil broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Medvedev surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 19 times with a 66% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medvedev | ||||
| R2 Murray | R3 Martinez Portero | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 37 | |
| pts | 60-41 | 65-48 | 125-89 | |
| Total points | 101 | 113 | 214 | |
| Winners | 27 | 31 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 48% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 14 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 32/50 | 39/55 | 71/105 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 31/39 | 58/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 79% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 10/16 | 21/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 63% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Brooksby | |||||
| R1 Coria | R2 Basilashvili | R3 Bautista-Agut | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-1 | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 16 | 31 | 73 | |
| pts | 82-73 | 64-42 | 97-93 | 243-208 | |
| Total points | 155 | 106 | 190 | 451 | |
| Winners | 28 | 31 | 36 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 48% | 37% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 8 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 48/76 | 37/59 | 57/96 | 142/231 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 28/48 | 31/37 | 36/57 | 95/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 84% | 63% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 9/22 | 22/39 | 43/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 41% | 56% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 8 | 5 | 6 | 19 | |
| Converted | 8/12 | 5/5 | 6/12 | 19/29 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 66% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 | 10 | 20 | |
| Saved | 2/8 | 1/2 | 6/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 50% | 60% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 1 | 4 | 11 | |
Tennis Scores in Miami
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Sebastian KordaKorda (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-65 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Tommy PaulPaul (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (5-7 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Denis KudlaKudla (7-65 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Gael MonfilsMonfils (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-6(5) 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Tommy PaulPaul (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Sebastian KordaKorda (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Jannik SinnerSinner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Cameron NorrieNorrie (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction