Jerome Kym and Jonas Forejtek will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Lugano Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on CAMPO 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jonas Forejtek who should win in 2 sets.
Jonas Forejtek -> 1.25
Jerome Kym -> 3.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Jonas Forejtek
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Jonas Forejtek since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 35-9 | 6-1 | 27-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Kym got to the qualifications after defeating David Poljak 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Jerome had a good straight sets win against Poljak (6-3 7-5). During the match, Kym scored 80 points vs Poljak’s 65. Jerome was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kym struck 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jerome Kym lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Kym put 55% of his first serves in, winning 78% (28/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Kym broke Poljak 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Kym has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 53% of his matches (16-14). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kym has a composed2-4 match record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Kym has an aggregate 8-4 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lugano Challenger
Jonas Forejtek
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-17 | 5-4 | 12-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-21 | 0-3 | 17-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2022 | 32-24 | 3-2 | 14-11 | 14-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
2021 | 35-31 | 2-2 | 13-18 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2020 | 20-11 | 2-3 | 13-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 327, Forejtek reached the qualifications after beating Georgii Kravchenko 7-66 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Kravchenko (7-66 6-3). During the match Forejtek scored 73 points vs Kravchenko’s 63. Jonas was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Forejtek scored 5 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jonas Forejtek was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (38/46) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Czech broke Kravchenko once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
Forejtek’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Portimao and the Lille Challenger.
The Czech has an aggregate 15-6 win-loss record in 2022, 12-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Lugano Challenger
Forejtek has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kym | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 21 | 22 |
Pts | 80-65 | 73-63 |
Total Points | 145 | 136 |
Winners | 28 | 38 |
%Winners | 35% | 52% |
Both Kym and Forejtek played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kym and Forejtek have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kym played 1 game less than Forejtek. Kym scored 28 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Forejtek fired 38 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kym | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Aces | 11 | 5 |
Avg per match | 11 | 5 |
1st in | 36/65 | 46/65 |
%1st in | 55% | 71% |
1st pts | 28/36 | 38/46 |
%1st pts | 78% | 83% |
2nd pts | 13/29 | 11/19 |
%2nd pts | 45% | 58% |
Kym managed to score 11 aces . Forejtek made 5 aces . Kym won 78% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Forejtek won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kym | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 1 |
Converted | 5/14 | 1/8 |
% Converted | 36% | 13% |
Conceded | 7 | 3 |
Saved | 5 | 3 |
% Saved | 71% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Jerome broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Swiss lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Jonas broke his opponent once with a 13% conversion rate. Forejtek was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Kym | |||
Q1 Poljak | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 80-65 | 80-65 | |
Total points | 145 | 145 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 11 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 36/65 | 36/65 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 13/29 | 13/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Forejtek | |||
Q1 Kravchenko | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-66 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 73-63 | 73-63 | |
Total points | 136 | 136 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 52% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 46/65 | 46/65 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 38/46 | 38/46 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/8 | 1/8 | |
Converted % | 13% | 13% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (3-7) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Yunseong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Jakub PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction