Ruben Bemelmans and Gijs Brouwer will square off in the qualifications of the Lugano Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CAMPO 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ruben Bemelmans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ruben Bemelmans is the pick to win this match.
Ruben Bemelmans -> 1.68
Gijs Brouwer -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ruben Bemelmans vs. Gijs Brouwer
There is no head to head record between Ruben Bemelmans and Gijs Brouwer since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Ruben Bemelmans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8-15 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-20 | 3-3 | 1-6 | 7-5 | 3-4 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2019 | 23-31 | 5-13 | 1-3 | 7-10 | 9-4 | 1-1 |
| 2018 | 39-33 | 17-11 | 4-6 | 10-11 | 4-4 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 299, Bemelmans got to the qualifications after beating Giovanni Fonio 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ruben had a good straight sets win against Fonio (7-5 6-4). During the match, Bemelmans scored 61 points vs Fonio’s 49. Ruben was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bemelmans bagged 5 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Ruben Bemelmans was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 82% (14/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ruben broke Fonio twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Bemelmans has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (294-244). 5-6 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Bemelmans has a compiled 91-72 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Ruben has a compiled 5-8 win-loss record in 2022, 5-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lugano Challenger
Bemelmans has never competed in this tournament before.
Gijs Brouwer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-12 | 4-5 | 4-2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-34 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-27 | 12-5 | 13-5 | 14-12 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 9-5 | 12-10 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 13-4 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 356, the Dutch got to the qualifications after defeating Khumoun Sultanov 7-62 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Sultanov (7-62 6-0). During the match Brouwer scored 65 points vs Sultanov’s 37. Gijs was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Brouwer struck 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Gijs Brouwer was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (25/34) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Sultanov 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Gijs’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Portimao.
Gijs has an aggregate 12-7 win-loss record in 2022, 9-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bemelmans | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 |
| Pts | 61-49 | 65-37 |
| Total Points | 110 | 102 |
| Winners | 32 | 25 |
| %Winners | 52% | 38% |
Both Bemelmans and Brouwer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Bemelmans and Brouwer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Bemelmans played 3 games more than Brouwer. Bemelmans scored 32 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Gijs recorded 25 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bemelmans | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 34/49 |
| %1st in | 70% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 25/34 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 14/17 | 9/15 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 60% |
Bemelmans struck 5 aces . Brouwer blasted 5 aces . Bemelmans won 82% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bemelmans | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 67% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Bemelmans broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Ruben had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Brouwer broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bemelmans | |||
| Q1 Fonio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 61-49 | 61-49 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 39/56 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/17 | 14/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Brouwer | |||
| Q1 Sultanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-37 | 65-37 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/49 | 34/49 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (3-7) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Yunseong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Jakub PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
