Filip Horansky and Marek Gengel will clash against each other in the quarter of the Biel Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Horansky who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Filip Horansky is the pick to win this match.
Filip Horansky -> 1.55
Marek Gengel -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Filip Horansky vs. Marek Gengel
There is no head to head record between Filip Horansky and Marek Gengel since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Filip Horansky
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 19-30 | 3-3 | 8-15 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2021 | 27-29 | 1-2 | 20-18 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-17 | 1-2 | 15-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 34-33 | 1-3 | 24-16 | 9-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2018 | 48-27 | 0-0 | 38-19 | 8-6 | 2-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 199, the Slovakian reached the quarter after beating Jerome Kym 6-3 6-3 and Kilian Feldbausch 7-66 7-65.
In the 2nd round, The Slovakian had a good straight sets win against Feldbausch (7-66 7-65). During the match, Horansky scored 84 points vs Feldbausch’s 82. Filip was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Horansky struck 3 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Filip Horansky lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Horansky put 71% of his first serves in, winning 64% (37/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. Horansky broke Feldbausch 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Filip hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 54% of the points he played.
Horansky has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (366-246). 5-5 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Horansky has an aggregate 52-56 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Slovakian has an overall 8-7 win-loss record in 2022, 5-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Filip has never competed in this tournament before.
Marek Gengel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-13 | 33-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 431, the Czech got to the quarter after beating Yunseong Chung 3-6 6-4 6-3, Dan Added 6-1 6-71 6-4, Ruben Bemelmans 7-64 7-63 and Borna Gojo 7-66 4-6 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Czech defeated Gojo (7-66 4-6 6-1). During the match Gengel scored 100 points vs Gojo’s 94. Gengel was pretty aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, Gengel made 9 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Marek Gengel lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 67% of his first serves in, winning 66% (51/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (23/38) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Gojo 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
The Czech’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Marek has an aggregate 12-6 win-loss record in 2022, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Horansky | Gengel |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 4 | 11 |
Tot Games | 44 | 114 |
Pts | 146-126 | 360-343 |
Total Points | 272 | 703 |
Winners | 65 | 173 |
%Winners | 45% | 48% |
Horansky played 2 matches while Gengel competed in 4 matches. Gengel started his run from the qualifications while Horansky had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Marek Gengel conceded 3 sets while Filip Horansky hasn’t lost a set so far. Horansky has played 7 set(s) less than Gengel (4 vs 11). Therefore, Horansky played 70 games less than Gengel. The Slovakian scored 65 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Marek managed to score 173 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Horansky | Gengel |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 32 |
Avg per match | 2.5 | 8 |
1st in | 94/135 | 252/359 |
%1st in | 70% | 70% |
1st pts | 65/94 | 173/252 |
%1st pts | 69% | 69% |
2nd pts | 23/41 | 60/107 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 56% |
Horansky managed to score 5 aces (2.5 per match). Gengel fired 32 aces (8 per match). Horansky won 69% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Horansky | Gengel |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 15 |
Converted | 7/11 | 15/32 |
% Converted | 64% | 47% |
Conceded | 9 | 27 |
Saved | 5 | 18 |
% Saved | 56% | 67% |
Times Broken | 4 | 9 |
Horansky broke his opponents 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Filip conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Gengel broke his opponents 15 times with a 47% conversion rate. Marek conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Horansky | ||||
R1 Kym |
R2 Feldbausch |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-66 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 26 | 44 | |
pts | 62-44 | 84-82 | 146-126 | |
Total points | 106 | 166 | 272 | |
Winners | 28 | 37 | 65 | |
%Winners | 45% | 44% | 45% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 36/53 | 58/82 | 94/135 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 71% | 70% | |
1st pts | 28/36 | 37/58 | 65/94 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 64% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 13/17 | 10/24 | 23/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 76% | 42% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 4/6 | 7/11 | |
Converted % | 60% | 67% | 64% | |
Conceded | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 2/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 33% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Gengel | ||||||
Q1 Chung |
Q3 Added |
R1 Bemelmans |
R2 Gojo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | 6-1 6-71 6-4 | 7-64 7-63 | 7-66 4-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 30 | 26 | 30 | 114 | |
pts | 76-78 | 106-97 | 78-74 | 100-94 | 360-343 | |
Total points | 154 | 203 | 152 | 194 | 703 | |
Winners | 33 | 45 | 44 | 51 | 173 | |
%Winners | 43% | 42% | 56% | 51% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 5 | 7 | 11 | 9 | 32 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | |
1st in | 52/78 | 66/83 | 57/83 | 77/115 | 252/359 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 80% | 69% | 67% | 70% | |
1st pts | 33/52 | 45/66 | 44/57 | 51/77 | 173/252 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 68% | 77% | 66% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 15/26 | 7/17 | 15/26 | 23/38 | 60/107 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 41% | 58% | 61% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 15 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 6/18 | 1/2 | 3/5 | 15/32 | |
Converted % | 71% | 33% | 50% | 60% | 47% | |
Conceded | 8 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 27 | |
Saved | 4/8 | 3/5 | 1/2 | 10/12 | 18 | |
Saved % | 50% | 60% | 50% | 83% | 122% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-1) – H2H and prediction