Juan Pablo Varillas and Johan Nikles will face off in the 2nd round of the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CANCHA 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Varillas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Pablo Varillas is the pick to win this match.
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 1.222
Johan Nikles -> 4.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Varillas vs. Johan Nikles
This will be the 2nd time that Juan Pablo Varillas and Johan Nikles clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Pablo Patino-Samudio (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Pablo Patino-Samudio won 6-2 6-1 in the 1st round in M25+H Bacau back in 2019.
Juan Pablo Varillas
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-19 | 0-4 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 4-7 | 23-17 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 2-3 | 51-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-23 | 0-2 | 51-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 1-2 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 119, Juan reached the 2nd round after beating Renzo Olivo 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Juan had a good straight sets win against Olivo (6-2 6-2). During the match, Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 67 points vs Olivo’s 43. The Peruvian was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pablo Patino-Samudio wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Juan Pablo Varillas conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Pablo Patino-Samudio put 72% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the 2nd serve. Pablo Patino-Samudio broke Olivo 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (322-202). 11-4 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pablo Patino-Samudio has a compiled290-172 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Juan’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Santiago Challenger.
Juan has a composed 13-6 win-loss record in 2022, 11-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger
Pablo Patino-Samudio has never competed in this tournament before.
Johan Nikles
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 3-2 | 25-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 19-19 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-28 | 1-3 | 42-21 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 293 (career-high), Johan reached the 2nd round after defeating Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Nikles had a good straight sets win against Carlos Prado Angelo (6-2 6-4). During the match Nikles scored 74 points vs Carlos Prado Angelo’s 63. Johan was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Nikles was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Johan Nikles lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Nikles put 69% of his first serves in, winning 55% (22/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. Johan broke Carlos Prado Angelo 7 times after converting 35% of his break points (7/20).
Johan has an aggregate 7-4 win-loss record in 2022, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
| Pts | 67-43 | 74-63 |
| Total Points | 110 | 137 |
| Winners | 26 | 22 |
| %Winners | 39% | 30% |
Both Pablo Patino-Samudio and Nikles played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pablo Patino-Samudio and Nikles have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Pablo Patino-Samudio played 2 games less than Nikles. Juan scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Nikles managed to score 22 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 38/53 | 40/58 |
| %1st in | 72% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 22/40 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 55% |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 8/18 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 44% |
Pablo Patino-Samudio didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nikles also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pablo Patino-Samudio won 68% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Nikles won 55% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 7/20 |
| % Converted | 36% | 35% |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Pablo Patino-Samudio broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Peruvian had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Nikles broke his opponent 7 times with a 35% conversion rate. Nikles conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pablo Patino-Samudio | |||
| R1 Olivo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 67-43 | 67-43 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 38/53 | 38/53 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Nikles | |||
| R1 Carlos Prado Angelo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 74-63 | 74-63 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/18 | 8/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/20 | 7/20 | |
| Converted % | 35% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLLLL
LWWLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Santa Cruz De La Sierra 2 Challenger
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Gerald MelzerMelzer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Gilbert Klier JuniorKlier Junior (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Corentin DenollyDenolly (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (2-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Yshai OlielOliel (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Nick HardtHardt (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Facundo JuarezJuarez (6-0 7-65) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Gonzalo LamaLama (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Johan NiklesNikles – Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Pablo CuevasCuevas (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
