Taro Daniel and Bjorn Fratangelo will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Taro Daniel who should win in 2 sets.
Taro Daniel -> 1.4
Bjorn Fratangelo -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Bjorn Fratangelo
This will be the 4th time that Taro Daniel and Bjorn Fratangelo fight against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Daniel (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Daniel won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Lyon Challenger back in 2021.
Taro Daniel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12-31 | 10-19 | 1-8 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-33 | 16-16 | 5-11 | 9-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-30 | 34-16 | 7-10 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 27-17 | 12-7 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-25 | 5-7 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 106, Daniel got to the qualifications after defeating Max Purcell 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Purcell (6-2 6-2). During the match, Daniel scored 58 points vs Purcell’s 36. Daniel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Daniel struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Taro Daniel was quite effective on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniel was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Purcell 4 times.
Daniel has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (356-259). 14-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Daniel has an overall 113-89 record in the last years on hard.
Daniel has an aggregate 15-6 win-loss record in 2022, 14-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Bjorn Fratangelo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6-7 | 4-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-17 | 7-8 | 6-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-20 | 13-10 | 12-7 | 8-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-20 | 15-11 | 3-6 | 3-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 158, Bjorn got to the qualifications after defeating Jay Clarke 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Bjorn had a good straight sets win against Clarke (6-2 6-1). During the match Fratangelo scored 56 points vs Clarke’s 28. Bjorn was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Fratangelo fired 2 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Bjorn Fratangelo was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 90% (18/20) of his 1st serve and 78% (14/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Clarke 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Traralgon Challenger.
Bjorn has an aggregate 7-7 win-loss record in 2022, 6-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Daniel | Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
| Pts | 58-36 | 56-28 |
| Total Points | 94 | 84 |
| Winners | 23 | 18 |
| %Winners | 40% | 32% |
Both Daniel and Fratangelo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Daniel and Fratangelo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Daniel played 1 game more than Fratangelo. Daniel scored 23 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Bjorn struck 18 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Daniel | Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 2 |
| 1st in | 28/52 | 20/38 |
| %1st in | 54% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 18/20 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/18 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 78% |
Daniel scored 5 aces . Fratangelo managed to score 2 aces . Daniel won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Fratangelo won 90% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 78% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Daniel | Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 100% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Taro broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Taro pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. Fratangelo broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Bjorn was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Daniel | |||
| Q1 Purcell | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-36 | 58-36 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/52 | 28/52 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 23/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fratangelo | |||
| Q1 Clarke | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-28 | 56-28 | |
| Total points | 84 | 84 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 20/38 | 20/38 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 18/20 | 18/20 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/18 | 14/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gilles SimonSimon – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Jack SockSock (6-5) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Andy MurrayMurray (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Benoit PairePaire (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – David GoffinGoffin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nicolas KickerKicker (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Elias YmerYmer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Facundo BagnisBagnis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (3-1) – H2H and prediction