Peter Gojowczyk and Emilio Gomez will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 7. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peter Gojowczyk who should win in 3 sets.
Peter Gojowczyk -> 1.63
Emilio Gomez -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Peter Gojowczyk vs. Emilio Gomez
There is no head to head record between Peter Gojowczyk and Emilio Gomez since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Peter Gojowczyk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 29-21 | 21-12 | 5-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-25 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 9-4 | 3-7 | 16-12 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-35 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 1-5 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 100, the German got to the qualifications after defeating Cedrik-Marcel Stebe 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Gojowczyk had a good straight sets win against Stebe (6-2 6-2). During the match, Gojowczyk scored 60 points vs Stebe’s 38. Gojowczyk was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gojowczyk scored 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Peter Gojowczyk was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Gojowczyk broke Stebe 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Gojowczyk has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (252-221). 3-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gojowczyk has a composed 113-96 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Gojowczyk has an overall 3-7 win-loss record in 2022, 3-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 145, Gomez got to the qualifications after beating Thiago Agustin Tirante 7-64 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Gomez defeated Agustin Tirante (7-64 4-6 6-3).During the match Gomez scored less points (1) than Agustin Tirante. In fact, the world no. 100 won 88 points vs Agustin Tirante’s. That means that Gomez was more focused during the important points. The Ecuadorian was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Gomez blasted 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Emilio Gomez was extremely efficient on serve to win 81% (43/53) of his 1st serve and 60% (25/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Emilio broke Agustin Tirante twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
The Ecuadorian has a compiled 8-8 win-loss record in 2022, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gojowczyk | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 32 |
| Pts | 60-38 | 88-89 |
| Total Points | 98 | 177 |
| Winners | 26 | 43 |
| %Winners | 43% | 49% |
Both Gojowczyk and Gomez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Emilio Gomez dropped 1 set while Peter Gojowczyk hasn’t lost a set so far. Gojowczyk has played 1 set(s) less than Gomez (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gojowczyk played 16 games less than Gomez. Gojowczyk scored 26 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Ecuadorian bagged 43 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gojowczyk | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 32/49 | 53/95 |
| %1st in | 65% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 43/53 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 25/42 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 60% |
Gojowczyk scored 5 aces . Gomez recorded 5 aces . Gojowczyk won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Gomez won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gojowczyk | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 57% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Peter broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Gojowczyk extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. Emilio broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gojowczyk | |||
| Q1 Stebe | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 60-38 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/49 | 32/49 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Gomez | |||
| Q1 Agustin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 88-89 | 88-89 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 53/95 | 53/95 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 43/53 | 43/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gilles SimonSimon – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Jack SockSock (6-5) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Andy MurrayMurray (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Benoit PairePaire (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – David GoffinGoffin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nicolas KickerKicker (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Elias YmerYmer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Facundo BagnisBagnis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (3-1) – H2H and prediction