Kevin Anderson and Mitchell Krueger will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 7. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kevin Anderson who should win in 3 sets.
Kevin Anderson -> 1.62
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kevin Anderson vs. Mitchell Krueger
There is no head to head record between Kevin Anderson and Mitchell Krueger since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kevin Anderson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-8 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-18 | 8-10 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 4-4 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 11-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91, Anderson got to the qualifications after beating Alex Bolt 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The South African had a good straight sets win against Bolt (6-3 6-4). During the match, Anderson scored 65 points vs Bolt’s 47. The South African was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Anderson made 18 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Kevin Anderson conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Anderson put 75% of his first serves in, winning 86% (38/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (7/15) on the 2nd serve. Kevin broke Bolt twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Anderson has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (266-171). 2-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Anderson has an overall 146-91 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Anderson has a composed 3-6 win-loss record in 2022, 2-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 12-17 | 9-7 | 7-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Mitchell got to the qualifications after defeating Stefan Kozlov 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Kozlov (6-2 6-2). During the match Krueger scored 56 points vs Kozlov’s 35. Mitchell was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Mitchell Krueger was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Krueger broke Kozlov 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Mitchell’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Traralgon Challenger.
The American has an overall 10-8 win-loss record in 2022, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2019 and 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Anderson | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 16 |
| Pts | 65-47 | 56-35 |
| Total Points | 112 | 91 |
| Winners | 38 | 21 |
| %Winners | 58% | 38% |
Both Anderson and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Anderson and Krueger have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Anderson played 3 games more than Krueger. The South African scored 38 winners (58% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 21 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Anderson | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 18 | 1 |
| 1st in | 44/59 | 28/45 |
| %1st in | 75% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 38/44 | 21/28 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 9/17 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 53% |
Anderson scored 18 aces . Krueger scored 1 ace . Anderson won 86% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Anderson | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 56% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Anderson broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Anderson pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Mitchell broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Anderson | |||
| Q1 Bolt | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 65-47 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 44/59 | 44/59 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 38/44 | 38/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Kozlov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 56-35 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gilles SimonSimon – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Jack SockSock (6-5) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Andy MurrayMurray (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Benoit PairePaire (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – David GoffinGoffin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nicolas KickerKicker (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Elias YmerYmer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Facundo BagnisBagnis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (3-1) – H2H and prediction