Facundo Juarez and Naoki Nakagawa will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 5:30 pm on CANCHA 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Juarez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Facundo Juarez is the pick to win this match.
Facundo Juarez -> 1.52
Naoki Nakagawa -> 2.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Facundo Juarez vs. Naoki Nakagawa
There is no head to head record between Facundo Juarez and Naoki Nakagawa since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Facundo Juarez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-3 | 0-0 | 14-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-20 | 0-0 | 22-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-24 | 0-1 | 28-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 65-30 | 0-1 | 65-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 346 (career-high), Juarez got to the qualifications after beating Alejandro Mendoza 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Mendoza (6-4 7-5). During the match, Juarez scored 73 points vs Mendoza’s 55. Facundo was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Juarez wasn’t able to score even 1 ace and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Facundo Juarez was extremely efficient on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Facundo broke Mendoza 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Juarez has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 65% of his matches (193-105). 7-4 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Juarez has an aggregate185-97 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Argentine has a composed 7-4 win-loss record in 2022, 7-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Naoki Nakagawa
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-23 | 42-19 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-27 | 16-16 | 10-9 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-15 | 32-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-4 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 520, Nakagawa reached the qualifications after beating Freddy Gustavo Rioja Ricaldi 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, Naoki had a good straight sets win against Gustavo Rioja Ricaldi (6-3 6-0). During the match Nakagawa scored 62 points vs Gustavo Rioja Ricaldi’s 37. Nakagawa was exceptionally aggressive to blast 14 winners.
About the serving games, Nakagawa fired 2 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Naoki Nakagawa was pretty efficient on serve to win 78% (14/18) of his 1st serve and 83% (15/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Naoki broke Gustavo Rioja Ricaldi 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Nakagawa has an overall 3-1 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Juarez | Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 15 |
| Pts | 73-55 | 62-37 |
| Total Points | 128 | 99 |
| Winners | 32 | 14 |
| %Winners | 44% | 23% |
Both Juarez and Nakagawa played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Juarez and Nakagawa have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Juarez played 7 games more than Nakagawa. Juarez scored 32 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Naoki fired 14 winners (23%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Juarez | Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 39/60 | 18/36 |
| %1st in | 65% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 14/18 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 15/18 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 83% |
Juarez didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nakagawa recorded 2 aces . Juarez won 82% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Nakagawa won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Juarez | Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 75% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Juarez broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Facundo conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Naoki broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Nakagawa was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Juarez | |||
| Q1 Mendoza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-55 | 73-55 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/60 | 39/60 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nakagawa | |||
| Q1 Gustavo Rioja Ricaldi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 62-37 | 62-37 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 14 | 14 | |
| %Winners | 23% | 23% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 18/36 | 18/36 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 14/18 | 14/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWWWW
WLWWWLWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Gilbert Soares Klier JuniorSoares Klier Junior (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Corentin DenollyDenolly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Paul JubbJubb (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Pablo CuevasCuevas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Damien WengerWenger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (4-0) – H2H and prediction
