Dan Added and Marek Gengel will face off in the qualifications of the Biel Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dan Added who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dan Added is the pick to win this match.
Dan Added -> 1.69
Marek Gengel -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dan Added vs. Marek Gengel
This will be the 2nd time that Dan Added and Marek Gengel clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Added (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Added won 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the semifinal in Czech Republic F11 (Valasske Mezirici) back in 2017.
Dan Added
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-21 | 4-7 | 10-10 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-36 | 22-13 | 4-10 | 9-12 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 57-29 | 26-11 | 5-6 | 19-8 | 1-2 | 6-2 |
| 2021 | 44-29 | 21-11 | 9-10 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 10-0 |
| 2020 | 11-13 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370 (career-high), Added got to the qualifications after defeating Yannik Steinegger 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Added had a good straight sets win against Steinegger (6-4 6-1). During the match, Added scored 62 points vs Steinegger’s 40. Dan was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Added struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Dan Added was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Steinegger 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Added has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (163-113). 6-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Added has an aggregate55-43 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Dan’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Monastir.
The French player has a compiled 14-7 win-loss record in 2022, 6-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-14 | 33-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 432, Gengel reached the qualifications after beating Yunseong Chung 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Chung, Marek recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3).During the match Gengel scored less points (2) than Chung. In fact, the world no. 370 won 76 points vs Chung’s. That means that Gengel was more focused during the important points. Marek was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Gengel managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marek Gengel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 67% of his first serves in, winning 63% (33/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. Gengel broke Chung 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The Czech’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
The Czech has a compiled 9-6 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Added | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 28 |
| Pts | 62-40 | 76-78 |
| Total Points | 102 | 154 |
| Winners | 24 | 33 |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% |
Both Added and Gengel played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Marek Gengel conceded 1 set while Dan Added hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Added has played 1 set(s) less than Gengel (2 vs 3). Therefore, Added played 11 games less than Gengel. Added scored 24 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Marek scored 33 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Added | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 52/78 |
| %1st in | 57% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 33/52 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 58% |
Added struck 4 aces . Gengel recorded 5 aces . Added won 77% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Added | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 80% | 71% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Added broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Added quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Gengel broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Marek conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Added | |||
| Q1 Steinegger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-40 | 62-40 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Gengel | |||
| Q1 Chung |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 76-78 | 76-78 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 52/78 | 52/78 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 33/52 | 33/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWL
LLWWWLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuichi SugitaSugita – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Daniel MasurMasur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Brayden SchnurSchnur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Dan AddedAdded (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Go SoedaSoeda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – David PoljakPoljak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
