Mats Moraing and Mitchell Krueger will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Phoenix Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.88
Mats Moraing -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mats Moraing vs. Mitchell Krueger
This will be the 2nd time that Mats Moraing and Mitchell Krueger face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Moraing (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they played, Moraing won 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 in the qualifications in the Heilbronn Challenger back in 2015.
Mats Moraing
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 14-16 | 5-8 | 6-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-26 | 4-6 | 6-11 | 6-4 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 31-22 | 2-2 | 21-14 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-25 | 10-7 | 10-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 128 (career-high), Moraing got to the qualifications after beating Jason Jung 6-2 3-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, Mats defeated Jung (6-2 3-6 7-5). During the match, Moraing scored 92 points vs Jung’s 86. Moraing was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Moraing struck 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mats Moraing lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Moraing put 45% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (26/48) on the 2nd serve. Mats broke Jung 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Moraing has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (335-201). 2-2 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Moraing has an overall 86-49 match record in the last years on hard.
Moraing’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Turin Challenger.
The German has an aggregate 8-4 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Phoenix Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-15 | 16-6 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, the American got to the qualifications after beating Zachary Svajda 6-74 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications against Svajda, Krueger recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-3 6-1). During the match Krueger scored 106 points vs Svajda’s 91. Krueger was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Krueger bagged 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Mitchell Krueger was very effective on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Mitchell broke Svajda 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Mitchell’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Traralgon Challenger.
The American has a composed 8-7 win-loss record in 2022, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moraing | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 |
| Pts | 92-86 | 106-91 |
| Total Points | 178 | 197 |
| Winners | 27 | 42 |
| %Winners | 29% | 40% |
Both Moraing and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Mats Moraing surrendered 1 set, while Mitchell Krueger dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Moraing and Krueger have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (29). Moraing scored 27 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 42 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moraing | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 5 |
| 1st in | 40/88 | 54/91 |
| %1st in | 45% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 42/54 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 26/48 | 19/37 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 51% |
Moraing fired 9 aces . Krueger recorded 5 aces . Moraing won 68% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moraing | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 75% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 6 | 2 |
| % Saved | 60% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Moraing lost his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Krueger broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Krueger conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moraing | |||
| Q1 Jung |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 92-86 | 92-86 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/88 | 40/88 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/48 | 26/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 106-91 | 106-91 | |
| Total points | 197 | 197 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 54/91 | 54/91 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 42/54 | 42/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/37 | 19/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gilles SimonSimon – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan KingKing – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Fernando VerdascoVerdasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Radu AlbotAlbot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Facundo BagnisBagnis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
