Jesper De Jong and Paul Jubb will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Santiago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CANCHA 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.61
Paul Jubb -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Jesper De Jong and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-31 | 8-7 | 20-13 | 5-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 48-25 | 12-5 | 33-15 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, De Jong reached the 2nd round after defeating Tomas Barrios Vera 6-1 7-60.
In the 1st round, De Jong had a good straight sets win against Tomas Barrios Vera (6-1 7-60). During the match, De Jong scored 82 points vs Tomas Barrios Vera’s 65. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Jong struck 7 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, De Jong put 58% of his first serves in, winning 78% (36/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. De Jong broke Tomas Barrios Vera 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
De Jong has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (135-76). 1-0 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, De Jong has an overall73-36 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
De Jong’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Traralgon Challenger.
De Jong has an aggregate 6-5 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santiago Challenger
De Jong has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-20 | 17-7 | 6-6 | 1-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 318, Paul reached the 2nd round after defeating Nicolas Bruna 6-2 6-4, Cristian Rodriguez 6-4 6-4 and Hernan Casanova 6-1 2-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Paul defeated Casanova (6-1 2-6 6-2). During the match Jubb scored 92 points vs Casanova’s 66. Paul was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb blasted 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 66% of his first serves in, winning 80% (36/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Casanova 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Jubb has a composed 10-4 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Jong | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 61 |
| Pts | 82-65 | 220-163 |
| Total Points | 147 | 383 |
| Winners | 36 | 89 |
| %Winners | 44% | 40% |
De Jong played 1 match while Jubb competed in 3 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while De Jong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Paul Jubb lost 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. De Jong has played 5 set(s) less than Jubb (2 vs 7). Therefore, De Jong played 41 games less than Jubb. The Dutch scored 36 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit made 89 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Jong | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 46/80 | 110/174 |
| %1st in | 58% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 89/110 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 37/64 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 58% |
De Jong fired 7 aces . Jubb blasted 11 aces (3.7 per match). De Jong won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Jong | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 10 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 10/27 |
| % Converted | 30% | 37% |
| Conceded | 9 | 10 |
| Saved | 8 | 7 |
| % Saved | 89% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
De Jong broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. The Dutch lost his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 10 times with a 37% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Jong | |||
| R1 Tomas Barrios Vera | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-60 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 82-65 | 82-65 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 46/80 | 46/80 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 36/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 16/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jubb | |||||
| Q1 Bruna | Q3 Rodriguez | R1 Casanova | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 23 | 61 | |
| pts | 60-41 | 68-56 | 92-66 | 220-163 | |
| Total points | 101 | 124 | 158 | 383 | |
| Winners | 22 | 31 | 36 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 26/44 | 39/62 | 45/68 | 110/174 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 66% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 31/39 | 36/45 | 89/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 79% | 80% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/18 | 13/23 | 10/23 | 37/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 57% | 43% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 2/6 | 5/14 | 10/27 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 33% | 36% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 5/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 63% | 163% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Santiago Challenger
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Facundo JuarezJuarez (6-2 6-74 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-1 7-60) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Evan FurnessFurness (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Pedro CachinCachin (2-6 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Daniel Antonio NunezAntonio Nunez (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas JarryJarry (1-6 7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Ignacio Antonio Becerra OtarolaAntonio Becerra Otarola (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Facundo MenaMena (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-0 7-65) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas JarryJarry (1-6 7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Daniel Antonio NunezAntonio Nunez (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Renzo OlivoOlivo (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (0-0) – H2H and prediction