Carlos Gimeno Valero and Marco Miceli will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Roseto Degli Abruzzi 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carlos Gimeno Valero who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Carlos Gimeno Valero is the pick to win this match.
Carlos Gimeno Valero -> 1.10
Marco Miceli -> 6.50
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Carlos Gimeno Valero vs. Marco Miceli
There is no head to head record between Carlos Gimeno Valero and Marco Miceli since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Carlos Gimeno Valero
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-16 | 3-2 | 20-13 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-5 | 5-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, the Spaniard got to the qualifications after beating Luigi Sorrentino 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Sorrentino (6-4 6-3). During the match, Gimeno Valero scored 76 points vs Sorrentino’s 68. Carlos was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gimeno Valero wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Carlos Gimeno Valero lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Gimeno Valero put 79% of his first serves in, winning 57% (36/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the 2nd serve. Gimeno Valero broke Sorrentino 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Gimeno Valero has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 67% of his matches (58-28). 3-3 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Gimeno Valero has an overall49-23 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
Gimeno Valero has a compiled 3-3 win-loss record in 2022, 3-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi 1 Challenger
Carlos has never competed in this tournament before.
Marco Miceli
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-21 | 3-3 | 15-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-26 | 2-4 | 19-21 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-33 | 15-11 | 19-20 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 748, Miceli reached the qualifications after beating Marco Brugnerotto 6-3 2-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, Miceli defeated Brugnerotto (6-3 2-6 6-1). During the match Miceli scored 85 points vs Brugnerotto’s 77. Miceli was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Miceli scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Marco Miceli lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Miceli put 86% of his first serves in, winning 52% (34/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the 2nd serve. Miceli broke Brugnerotto 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Marco has an aggregate 3-5 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gimeno Valero | Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 24 |
| Pts | 76-68 | 85-77 |
| Total Points | 144 | 162 |
| Winners | 36 | 34 |
| %Winners | 47% | 40% |
Both Gimeno Valero and Miceli played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Marco Miceli surrendered 1 set while Carlos Gimeno Valero hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gimeno Valero has played 1 set(s) less than Miceli (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gimeno Valero played 5 games less than Miceli. Gimeno Valero scored 36 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Miceli bagged 34 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gimeno Valero | Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 63/80 | 65/76 |
| %1st in | 79% | 86% |
| 1st pts | 36/63 | 34/65 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 52% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 6/11 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 55% |
Gimeno Valero didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Miceli scored 3 aces . Gimeno Valero won 57% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Miceli won 52% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gimeno Valero | Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 42% | 58% |
| Conceded | 9 | 12 |
| Saved | 7 | 7 |
| % Saved | 78% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Gimeno Valero broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Gimeno Valero dropped his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Marco broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Marco conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gimeno Valero | |||
| Q1 Sorrentino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 76-68 | 76-68 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 63/80 | 63/80 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 36/63 | 36/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Miceli | |||
| Q1 Brugnerotto |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 85-77 | 85-77 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 65/76 | 65/76 | |
| % 1st in | 86% | 86% | |
| 1st pts | 34/65 | 34/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 52% | 52% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWLLW
LWWLWLLLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Andrej MartinMartin (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Daniele CapecchiCapecchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Oscar MoraingMoraing (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero – Marco MiceliMiceli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
