Michael Geerts and Roy Smith will face off in the qualifications of the Turin Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Geerts who should win in 2 sets.
Michael Geerts -> 1.35
Roy Smith -> 3.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Michael Geerts vs. Roy Smith
There is no head to head record between Michael Geerts and Roy Smith since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Michael Geerts
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-34 | 27-15 | 10-14 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-37 | 18-11 | 10-12 | 17-13 | 0-1 | 5-0 |
| 2023 | 32-39 | 13-10 | 13-19 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 42-37 | 5-8 | 24-14 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 13-7 | 14-14 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 351, the Belgian got to the qualifications after defeating Oscar Moraing 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Moraing (6-4 6-0). During the match, Geerts scored 63 points vs Moraing’s 38. Michael was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Geerts recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Michael Geerts was pretty effective on serve to win 92% (22/24) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Geerts broke Moraing 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Geerts has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (240-164). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Geerts has a composed32-27 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The Belgian has a compiled 4-6 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Turin Challenger
Geerts has never competed in this tournament before.
Roy Smith
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-21 | 2-10 | 0-0 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-24 | 14-17 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-10 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2019 | 13-27 | 8-20 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 558, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Stefano Reitano 7-5 7-65.
In the qualifications, Smith had a good straight sets win against Reitano (7-5 7-65). During the match Smith scored 86 points vs Reitano’s 76. The American was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Smith struck 15 aces and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Roy Smith lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Smith put 62% of his first serves in, winning 82% (37/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Smith broke Reitano 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Roy has an aggregate 2-2 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Geerts | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 25 |
| Pts | 63-38 | 86-76 |
| Total Points | 101 | 162 |
| Winners | 22 | 37 |
| %Winners | 35% | 43% |
Both Geerts and Smith played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Geerts and Smith have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Geerts played 9 games less than Smith. Michael scored 22 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Smith made 37 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Geerts | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 15 |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 45/73 |
| %1st in | 62% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 37/45 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 13/28 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 46% |
Geerts struck 4 aces . Smith blasted 15 aces . Geerts won 92% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Smith won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Geerts | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 33% | 60% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Belgian broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Geerts was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Roy broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Smith conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Geerts | |||
| Q1 Moraing | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-38 | 63-38 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 22/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Smith | |||
| Q1 Reitano | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 86-76 | 86-76 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 45/73 | 45/73 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 37/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Albano OlivettiOlivetti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Antoine BellierBellier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Roy SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Tobias KamkeKamke (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Mats MoraingMoraing (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Tobias SimonSimon (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction