Radu Albot and Emilio Nava will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Pau Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Albot who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Radu Albot is the pick to win this match.
Radu Albot -> 1.5
Emilio Nava -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Radu Albot vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Radu Albot and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Radu Albot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-26 | 12-9 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-18 | 0-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 97, Albot reached the qualifications after beating Alexey Vatutin 6-3 7-63.
In the qualifications, The Moldovan had a good straight sets win against Vatutin (6-3 7-63). During the match, Albot scored 81 points vs Vatutin’s 73. Albot was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Albot managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Radu Albot lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Albot put 63% of his first serves in, winning 74% (39/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (12/31) on the 2nd serve. Radu broke Vatutin 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Albot has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (340-265). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Albot has a compiled 68-54 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Radu has an overall 9-4 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pau Challenger
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-27 | 15-14 | 5-6 | 4-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, Emilio reached the qualifications after defeating Mathieu Perchicot 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Perchicot (6-0 6-2). During the match Nava scored 54 points vs Perchicot’s 25. Emilio was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Emilio Nava was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Perchicot 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The American has an aggregate 8-3 win-loss record in 2022, 8-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pau Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Albot | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 14 |
| Pts | 81-73 | 54-25 |
| Total Points | 154 | 79 |
| Winners | 39 | 21 |
| %Winners | 48% | 39% |
Both Albot and Nava played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Albot and Nava have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Albot played 8 games more than Nava. The Moldovan scored 39 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio blasted 21 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Albot | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 53/84 | 24/37 |
| %1st in | 63% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 21/24 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 12/31 | 8/13 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 62% |
Albot struck 2 aces . Nava struck 4 aces . Albot won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 88% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Albot | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 60% | 56% |
| Conceded | 11 | 1 |
| Saved | 9 | 1 |
| % Saved | 82% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Radu broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Moldovan conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Nava was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Albot | |||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 81-73 | 81-73 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 53/84 | 53/84 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 39/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/31 | 12/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Perchicot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 54-25 | 54-25 | |
| Total points | 79 | 79 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 21/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLW
WLLLWWLLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Yshai OlielOliel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Nicola KuhnKuhn (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Maxime JanvierJanvier (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yannick MadenMaden (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
