Jack Draper and Tim Van Rijthoven will square off in the final of the Forli 4 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 6:00 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tim Van Rijthoven who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tim Van Rijthoven is the pick to win this match.
Tim Van Rijthoven -> 1.7
Jack Draper -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Draper vs. Tim Van Rijthoven
This will be the 2nd time that Jack Draper and Tim Van Rijthoven face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van Rijthoven (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Van Rijthoven won 6-2 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Barnstaple back in 2019.
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-13 | 9-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 17-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 201 (career-high), the Brit got to the final after beating Mirza Basic 6-2 6-2, Quentin Halys 7-64 6-4, Evan Furness 6-2 6-3 and Yosuke Watanuki 6-3 4-6 6-3.
In the semifinal, Jack defeated Watanuki (6-3 4-6 6-3). During the match, Draper scored 88 points vs Watanuki’s 74. Jack was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Draper managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jack Draper was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Draper broke Watanuki 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Draper has dropped 1 set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Draper has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 70% of his matches (118-50). 11-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Draper has a composed41-15 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Forli 2 Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 11-2 win-loss record in 2022, 11-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 4 Challenger
Tim Van Rijthoven
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-24 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 25-15 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-22 | 13-7 | 7-6 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 8-8 | 3-2 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 236, the Dutch got to the final after defeating Christian Capacci 6-1 6-3, Zhizhen Zhang 6-3 7-63, Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-2 7-61, Brayden Schnur 7-65 7-5, Robin Haase 6-4 6-3 and Nuno Borges 6-4 6-2.
In the semifinal, Van Rijthoven had a good straight sets win against Borges (6-4 6-2). During the match Van Rijthoven scored 66 points vs Borges’s 44. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Van Rijthoven blasted 16 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tim Van Rijthoven was quite efficient on serve to win 88% (29/33) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Borges 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Forli 4 Challenger.
Van Rijthoven has a compiled 13-4 win-loss record in 2022, 11-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Draper | Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 84 | 121 |
| Pts | 287-221 | 442-341 |
| Total Points | 508 | 783 |
| Winners | 119 | 214 |
| %Winners | 41% | 48% |
Draper played 4 matches while Van Rijthoven competed in 6 matches. Van Rijthoven started his run from the qualifications while Draper had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jack Draper lost 1 set while Tim Van Rijthoven hasn’t conceded a set so far. Draper has played 3 set(s) less than Van Rijthoven (9 vs 12). Therefore, Draper played 37 games less than Van Rijthoven. Jack scored 119 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch scored 214 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Draper | Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 33 | 62 |
| Avg per match | 8.3 | 10.3 |
| 1st in | 145/243 | 266/383 |
| %1st in | 60% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 119/145 | 214/266 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 55/98 | 63/117 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Draper blasted 33 aces (8.3 per match). Van Rijthoven blasted 62 aces (10.3 per match). Draper won 82% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Van Rijthoven won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Draper | Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 15 |
| Converted | 14/27 | 15/36 |
| % Converted | 52% | 42% |
| Conceded | 12 | 17 |
| Saved | 8 | 16 |
| % Saved | 67% | 94% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Draper broke his opponents 14 times with a 52% conversion rate. Jack lost his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Tim broke his opponents 15 times with a 42% conversion rate. Tim conceded his serve once and he saved 94% of the break points that he conceded.
| Draper | ||||||
| R1 Basic |
R2 Halys |
1/4 Furness |
1/2 Watanuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 7-64 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 | 17 | 28 | 84 | |
| pts | 65-43 | 73-64 | 61-40 | 88-74 | 287-221 | |
| Total points | 108 | 137 | 101 | 162 | 508 | |
| Winners | 25 | 37 | 21 | 36 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 51% | 34% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 7 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 33 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 43/72 | 24/44 | 50/79 | 145/243 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 60% | 55% | 63% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 37/43 | 21/24 | 36/50 | 119/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 86% | 88% | 72% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 16/29 | 12/20 | 16/29 | 55/98 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | 60% | 55% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 1/2 | 4/7 | 5/9 | 14/27 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 50% | 57% | 56% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/4 | 1/2 | 2/5 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 50% | 40% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Van Rijthoven | ||||||||
| Q1 Capacci |
Q3 Zhang |
R1 Uchiyama |
R2 Schnur |
1/4 Haase |
1/2 Borges |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 7-63 | 6-2 7-61 | 7-65 7-5 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 21 | 25 | 19 | 18 | 121 | |
| pts | 60-34 | 69-59 | 82-63 | 89-80 | 76-61 | 66-44 | 442-341 | |
| Total points | 94 | 128 | 145 | 169 | 137 | 110 | 783 | |
| Winners | 27 | 40 | 42 | 48 | 28 | 29 | 214 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 58% | 51% | 54% | 37% | 44% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 62 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 31/41 | 49/69 | 52/82 | 64/85 | 37/59 | 33/47 | 266/383 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 71% | 63% | 75% | 63% | 70% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 40/49 | 42/52 | 48/64 | 28/37 | 29/33 | 214/266 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 82% | 81% | 75% | 76% | 88% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/10 | 11/20 | 13/30 | 10/21 | 14/22 | 9/14 | 63/117 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 55% | 43% | 48% | 64% | 64% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 1/3 | 2/2 | 2/8 | 3/12 | 3/5 | 15/36 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 33% | 100% | 25% | 25% | 60% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 6/6 | 6/7 | 3/3 | 0/0 | 16 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 100% | 86% | 100% | – | 97% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWLL
LL Tennis Scores in Forli 4 Challenger
- Vlad Victor Cornea/Fabian FallertVictor Cornea/Fabian Fallert – Antonio Sancic/Igor ZelenaySancic/Igor Zelenay (6-4 3-6 10-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jack DraperDraper – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (0-1) – H2H and prediction
